Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
39. America's killed a million Iraqi kids over the last 24 years.
Sun May 24, 2015, 07:21 PM
May 2015

Newsflash that's missing from the News.



Maybe more. No one knows as no one in authority with any power for knowing has kept track.

Back when Madeleine Albright was Secretary of State, we'd already killed 500,000 because of economic sanctions, which included embargoes of medicine and infant formula.

Madame Sec. of State Albright said it was "worth it."



'We Think the Price Is Worth It'

Media uncurious about Iraq policy's effects--there or here

By Rahul Mahajan

Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?

Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it.
--60 Minutes (5/12/96)


Then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright's quote, calmly asserting that U.S. policy objectives were worth the sacrifice of half a million Arab children, has been much quoted in the Arabic press. It's also been cited in the United States in alternative commentary on the September 11 attacks (e.g., Alexander Cockburn, New York Press, 9/26/01).

But a Dow Jones search of mainstream news sources since September 11 turns up only one reference to the quote--in an op-ed in the Orange Country Register (9/16/01). This omission is striking, given the major role that Iraq sanctions play in the ideology of archenemy Osama bin Laden; his recruitment video features pictures of Iraqi babies wasting away from malnutrition and lack of medicine (New York Daily News, 9/28/01). The inference that Albright and the terrorists may have shared a common rationale--a belief that the deaths of thousands of innocents are a price worth paying to achieve one's political ends--does not seem to be one that can be made in U.S. mass media.

It's worth noting that on 60 Minutes, Albright made no attempt to deny the figure given by Stahl--a rough rendering of the preliminary estimate in a 1995 U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) report that 567,000 Iraqi children under the age of five had died as a result of the sanctions. In general, the response from government officials about the sanctions’ toll has been rather different: a barrage of equivocations, denigration of U.N. sources and implications that questioners have some ideological axe to grind (Extra!, 3-4/00).

There has also been an attempt to seize on the lowest possible numbers. In early 1998, Columbia University's Richard Garfield published a dramatically lower estimate of 106,000 to 227,000 children under five dead due to sanctions, which was reported in many papers (e.g. New Orleans Times-Picayune, 2/15/98). Later, UNICEF came out with the first authoritative report (8/99), based on a survey of 24,000 households, suggesting that the total “excess” deaths of children under 5 was about 500,000.

CONTINUED...

http://fair.org/extra-online-articles/we-think-the-price-is-worth-it/



I don't think the price was worth it. Glad to see there are so many others on DU who feel the same way.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We definitely owe them. Not sure about troops on the ground, but walking off is just wrong. Hoyt May 2015 #1
The Powell doctrine. He warned the country. onecaliberal May 2015 #2
Apparently to kill more of them to atone Warren Stupidity May 2015 #3
We could at least bring the aggressors to trial. Gregorian May 2015 #4
Our moral obligation is to restore Iraq to the state it was on 3/19/2003. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #37
Saddam was a brutal dictator but we had him in a box with the no fly zones. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #38
America's killed a million Iraqi kids over the last 24 years. Octafish May 2015 #39
Albright truly embraced evil in being willing to accept that price. Vattel May 2015 #63
Iraq? It is rapidly looking like the whole ME. jwirr May 2015 #6
Everything the US does in the Middle East turns to crap. MineralMan May 2015 #7
I second that MineralMan. Like Mr. Shraby always said about that shraby May 2015 #9
Seeing as how, as you say, when the US left "things reverted" to the old status quo, delrem May 2015 #11
You're reading that into my post. MineralMan May 2015 #13
I apologize. delrem May 2015 #58
It's not that we "don't understand." It's that we don't CARE Scootaloo May 2015 #30
Right on target Scootaloo!! guillaumeb May 2015 #47
That about sums it up MannyGoldstein May 2015 #53
no, way too simplistic Vattel May 2015 #64
A modern Marshall Plan? procon May 2015 #8
Sadly, there are things that were done that we Exilednight May 2015 #44
Our moral responsibility is to do nothing Nevernose May 2015 #10
I agree. bravenak May 2015 #34
First rule of holes: stop digging. pscot May 2015 #54
Shutting down the Embassy would be hard on would be immigrants from there treestar May 2015 #55
reparations well beyond our GNP reddread May 2015 #12
We already fixed their country and gave them a great starter democracy... ileus May 2015 #14
With a constitutional right to health care hootinholler May 2015 #19
I think it would make them happy sorefeet May 2015 #15
Prosecute our War Criminals PufPuf23 May 2015 #16
I share that dream also, PufPuf. nt Mnemosyne May 2015 #17
There are so many nations that same question applies to hootinholler May 2015 #18
Iran is also a good example and closer in proximity. salib May 2015 #33
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #20
How?/NT DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #21
we fixed what? trumad May 2015 #22
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #23
Did they ask us to do any of these things?/NT DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #24
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #26
The Iraqis asked us to invade their nation ? DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #29
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #32
Are you really that ignorant of the Middle East? trumad May 2015 #27
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #31
No they were quite fine before we invaded their country. trumad May 2015 #35
Post removed Post removed May 2015 #42
It took us a long time to perfect our democracy... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #36
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #45
The status quo is better than what we have now... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #49
Bush fixed Iraq.... Cali_Democrat May 2015 #48
It's our moral responsibility to prosecute Bush and his gang of liars for war crimes. L0oniX May 2015 #25
doesn't help the Iraqis treestar May 2015 #56
At least they would know that we tried to punish those that started the war over lies. L0oniX May 2015 #57
We can start by giving back everything we privatized and sold off to foreign investors n/t arcane1 May 2015 #28
First and foremost ... GeorgeGist May 2015 #40
At a bare minimum, war crimes trials for Bush, Cheney and other highly-placed KingCharlemagne May 2015 #41
''We'' as in BFEE Octafish May 2015 #43
You break it, you bomb it again. N/T Chathamization May 2015 #46
Reparations and voluntary repatriation. How about Texas? Smarmie Doofus May 2015 #50
We f'ked it up.. we can't just walk away. DCBob May 2015 #51
We don't bear full responsibility for breaking it Warpy May 2015 #52
I disagree gratuitous May 2015 #59
I sincerely doubt Saddam's iron fisted rule would have lasted longer than he did Warpy May 2015 #60
the point is... ausboy May 2015 #62
That's the point I was trying to make gratuitous May 2015 #67
Our moral responsibility? Prosecuting the war criminals who lied us into Iraq. Scuba May 2015 #61
It seems that our repsonse is based on two premsies: Vattel May 2015 #65
We owe Iraq big time, especially the Kurds. McCamy Taylor May 2015 #66
Particularly since the Kurds seem to be the only local military MannyGoldstein May 2015 #69
Our moral responsibility is to let them handle their own stuff. 99Forever May 2015 #68
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc May 2015 #70
What is our moral responsiblitiy to the shareholders Manny? Rex May 2015 #71
We don't owe them shit at this point. Fuck them. beaglelover May 2015 #72
Did they let you down? nt MannyGoldstein May 2015 #73
Short of troops on the ground... kentuck May 2015 #74
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What's our moral responsi...»Reply #39