Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What's our moral responsibility to Iraqis? [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)39. America's killed a million Iraqi kids over the last 24 years.
Newsflash that's missing from the News.

Maybe more. No one knows as no one in authority with any power for knowing has kept track.
Back when Madeleine Albright was Secretary of State, we'd already killed 500,000 because of economic sanctions, which included embargoes of medicine and infant formula.
Madame Sec. of State Albright said it was "worth it."
'We Think the Price Is Worth It'
Media uncurious about Iraq policy's effects--there or here
By Rahul Mahajan
Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?
Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it.
--60 Minutes (5/12/96)
Then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright's quote, calmly asserting that U.S. policy objectives were worth the sacrifice of half a million Arab children, has been much quoted in the Arabic press. It's also been cited in the United States in alternative commentary on the September 11 attacks (e.g., Alexander Cockburn, New York Press, 9/26/01).
But a Dow Jones search of mainstream news sources since September 11 turns up only one reference to the quote--in an op-ed in the Orange Country Register (9/16/01). This omission is striking, given the major role that Iraq sanctions play in the ideology of archenemy Osama bin Laden; his recruitment video features pictures of Iraqi babies wasting away from malnutrition and lack of medicine (New York Daily News, 9/28/01). The inference that Albright and the terrorists may have shared a common rationale--a belief that the deaths of thousands of innocents are a price worth paying to achieve one's political ends--does not seem to be one that can be made in U.S. mass media.
It's worth noting that on 60 Minutes, Albright made no attempt to deny the figure given by Stahl--a rough rendering of the preliminary estimate in a 1995 U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) report that 567,000 Iraqi children under the age of five had died as a result of the sanctions. In general, the response from government officials about the sanctions toll has been rather different: a barrage of equivocations, denigration of U.N. sources and implications that questioners have some ideological axe to grind (Extra!, 3-4/00).
There has also been an attempt to seize on the lowest possible numbers. In early 1998, Columbia University's Richard Garfield published a dramatically lower estimate of 106,000 to 227,000 children under five dead due to sanctions, which was reported in many papers (e.g. New Orleans Times-Picayune, 2/15/98). Later, UNICEF came out with the first authoritative report (8/99), based on a survey of 24,000 households, suggesting that the total excess deaths of children under 5 was about 500,000.
CONTINUED...
http://fair.org/extra-online-articles/we-think-the-price-is-worth-it/
I don't think the price was worth it. Glad to see there are so many others on DU who feel the same way.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
We definitely owe them. Not sure about troops on the ground, but walking off is just wrong.
Hoyt
May 2015
#1
Our moral obligation is to restore Iraq to the state it was on 3/19/2003.
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2015
#5
Saddam was a brutal dictator but we had him in a box with the no fly zones.
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2015
#38
Seeing as how, as you say, when the US left "things reverted" to the old status quo,
delrem
May 2015
#11
It's our moral responsibility to prosecute Bush and his gang of liars for war crimes.
L0oniX
May 2015
#25
At least they would know that we tried to punish those that started the war over lies.
L0oniX
May 2015
#57
We can start by giving back everything we privatized and sold off to foreign investors n/t
arcane1
May 2015
#28
At a bare minimum, war crimes trials for Bush, Cheney and other highly-placed
KingCharlemagne
May 2015
#41