Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ''There are only two things we should fight for.'' -- Maj. Gen. Smedley Darlington Butler [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)29. She seems to have made a remarkable U-turn in her approach to diplomacy: now it's pure PNAC.

Neocons and Liberals Together, Again
The neoconservative Project for the New American Century (PNAC) has signaled its intention to continue shaping the government's national security...
Tom Barry, last updated: February 02, 2005
The neoconservative Project for the New American Century (PNAC) has signaled its intention to continue shaping the government's national security strategy with a new public letter stating that the "U.S. military is too small for the responsibilities we are asking it to assume." Rather than reining in the imperial scope of U.S. national security strategy as set forth by the first Bush administration, PNAC and the letter's signatories call for increasing the size of America's global fighting machine.
SNIP...
Liberal Hawks Fly with the Neocons
The recent PNAC letter to Congress was not the first time that PNAC or its associated front groups, such as the Coalition for the Liberation of Iraq, have included hawkish Democrats.
Two PNAC letters in March 2003 played to those Democrats who believed that the invasion was justified at least as much by humanitarian concerns as it was by the purported presence of weapons of mass destruction. PNAC and the neocon camp had managed to translate their military agenda of preemptive and preventive strikes into national security policy. With the invasion underway, they sought to preempt those hardliners and military officials who opted for a quick exit strategy in Iraq. In their March 19th letter, PNAC stated that Washington should plan to stay in Iraq for the long haul: "Everyone-those who have joined the coalition, those who have stood aside, those who opposed military action, and, most of all, the Iraqi people and their neighbors-must understand that we are committed to the rebuilding of Iraq and will provide the necessary resources and will remain for as long as it takes."
Along with such neocon stalwarts as Robert Kagan, Bruce Jackson, Joshua Muravchik, James Woolsey, and Eliot Cohen, a half-dozen Democrats were among the 23 individuals who signed PNAC's first letter on post-war Iraq. Among the Democrats were Ivo Daalder of the Brookings Institution and a member of Clinton's National Security Council staff; Martin Indyk, Clinton's ambassador to Israel; Will Marshall of the Progressive Policy Institute and Democratic Leadership Council; Dennis Ross, Clinton's top adviser on the Israel-Palestinian negotiations; and James Steinberg, Clinton's deputy national security adviser and head of foreign policy studies at Brookings. A second post-Iraq war letter by PNAC on March 28 called for broader international support for reconstruction, including the involvement of NATO, and brought together the same Democrats with the prominent addition of another Brookings' foreign policy scholar, Michael O'Hanlon.
CONTINUED...
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/articles/display/Neocons_and_Liberals_Together_Again
One name to remember is Victoria Nuland, our woman in Ukraine, who is married to PNAC co-founder Robert Kagan, whose brother is Frederick Kagan. Frederick Kagan's spouse is Kimberly Kagan. Brilliant people, big ideas, and a lot of PNAC, which spells out the neocon/neolib approach to international relations means more wars without end for profits without cease, among other things detrimental to peace, justice, and democracy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
''There are only two things we should fight for.'' -- Maj. Gen. Smedley Darlington Butler [View all]
Octafish
May 2015
OP
If only our citizens had the same idea of what it means to be an American.
raouldukelives
May 2015
#30
She seems to have made a remarkable U-turn in her approach to diplomacy: now it's pure PNAC.
Octafish
May 2015
#29
Roger That - Many Citizens See HRC For What She Is - A Patron Of The Oligarchs
cantbeserious
May 2015
#44
War profiteering: The BIG Conspiracy of the 1%. (They sell the tin-foil hats, too.)
WinkyDink
May 2015
#11
Dubya always spoke his truth. Many simply chose to read him differently. Fool me....won't get fooled
WinkyDink
May 2015
#108
I totally agree with you. There is no question IMO as to the intentions of the
rhett o rick
May 2015
#82
I am disappointed that you got to a point where you thought it was necessary to
rhett o rick
May 2015
#84
"wars where started by people who thought they were defending..." BWAHAHAHAHA! They "thought" no
WinkyDink
May 2015
#59
I never state what their motivations were only what they have said they were...
Cryptoad
May 2015
#105
when Butler said Bill of Rights, he probably meant protecting it from internal threats
yurbud
May 2015
#23
in context, my interpretation is far more likely than one corporatists could use
yurbud
May 2015
#83
the most important post of the day. Every politician should be asked if they read this and forced
yurbud
May 2015
#20
That's a philosophy that sometimes leads to vast numbers of innocent people dying horribly and
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2015
#78
And somehow, Dubya knew FL was safe, even though his whereabouts had been published.
WinkyDink
May 2015
#62
Right Wingers think a country shows it's Power and Glory on the battlefield....
Spitfire of ATJ
May 2015
#58
There was a plot to overthrow FDR during the early years of his administration,
red dog 1
May 2015
#79