General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm going to hurl a few three letter "words" at President Obama's legacy [View all]cui bono
(19,926 posts)which I wasn't doing.
So my question stands... why did you decide to start this whole exchange with me using that?
And no, 'apologist' simply isn't the same thing as 'hater', you repeating that it is doesn't make it so. Apologist stands for something in the political world and is backed up on DU by a discussion of policy. 'Hater' is internet slang used to dismiss any and all criticism and is pretty much never accompanied by any discussion of policy. There's no rebuttal, just 'hater', as if that means the critical post means nothing. However, the critical posts on here are mostly substantiated with many facts and references. The apologists generally don't offer any of that up, though there are some that do, but they are still defending policies that were indefensible on DU when BushCo did them.
And that is the crux of it, apologists defend things Obama does just because he is Obama, even though they hated that sort of thing when BushCo did it. Critics of Obama criticized the same policy under BushCo. They are talking about policy, apologists are talking about a man.