Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(27,247 posts)

21. He should have chosen Sargent Shriver at the beginning

Tue May 26, 2015, 01:56 AM

May 2015

Shriver was a good man with a good background.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sargent_Shriver

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

George McGovern's loss had nothing to do with "liberalism". [View all] Ken Burch May 2015 OP

Pretty much the same scenario here. nt onehandle May 2015 #6

Thanks Ken tnlurker May 2015 #2

Don't forget Nixon's "October surprise" Art_from_Ark May 2015 #3

Oh that's just Water under the Gate...er, I mean the bridge... Ken Burch May 2015 #5

I was 11 and that was my first campaign AndreaCG May 2015 #7

those hypocrisies dont come from liberals reddread May 2015 #8

I called my favorite aunt that I thought was liberal, Paka May 2015 #9

I think that's a figment of your imagination MaggieD May 2015 #13

How many campaigns have you worked, murielm99 May 2015 #14

McGovern was my first presidential vote. Blue_In_AK May 2015 #11

But it had EVERYTHING to do with disunity.... MaggieD May 2015 #12

How can you claim that.... MaggieD May 2015 #16

He should have chosen Sargent Shriver at the beginning Art_from_Ark May 2015 #21

His loss was illustrative treestar May 2015 #19

It didn't with Coolidge, Reagan and Lil' Dubbikins. Ken Burch May 2015 #20

And don't forget "Democrats for Nixon" eridani May 2015 #22

I haven't forgotten. LWolf May 2015 #23