General Discussion

Divernan

(15,480 posts)

26. +1000

Reply to NYC_SKP (Reply #23)

Tue May 26, 2015, 02:57 PM

May 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

85 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

HuffPost: Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's State Department [View all] NYC_SKP May 2015 OP

"....asserting that it was in the national interest." Tierra_y_Libertad May 2015 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words May 2015 #2

All one needs to know about Hillary as SOS...is this: KoKo May 2015 #81

So, the argument by inference is that Clinton isn't influenced by pro-Israel donors and lobbyists. geek tragedy May 2015 #3

Yeah, she's in the Saudi's corner. B2G May 2015 #4

Do you think President Obama was not consulted on this decision? geek tragedy May 2015 #5

Reagan sold weapons to both sides during Iran-Iraq war. NYC_SKP May 2015 #7

Do you think that President Obama was left in the dark about this decision? geek tragedy May 2015 #8

Clinton Foundation reported that it "violated its ethics agreement with the Obama administration" NYC_SKP May 2015 #9

Just so I can get this straight, geek tragedy May 2015 #11

There is never any quid pro quo when our side does it. zeemike May 2015 #41

Comparing Hillary to Regan? bvar22 May 2015 #60

No, Reagan did it for ideological reasons, not to raise funds for himself, his family, or foundation NYC_SKP May 2015 #63

I doubt that this will get her more 'R' votes. They hate her too much. razorman May 2015 #76

I doubt you'd be so anxious to make logic pretzels if this were a Republican. Marr May 2015 #82

I feel like tridim May 2015 #6

I agree and we can do better with Sen Sanders. No quid pro quo to worry about. nm rhett o rick May 2015 #24

i just don't want to have that queasy feeling in 2016. nashville_brook May 2015 #29

What if it is the truth. bvar22 May 2015 #61

it was Obama's state department!!!!1!111! Doctor_J May 2015 #10

If this turns out to be even remotely true then the Republicans have their attack ads BrotherIvan May 2015 #12

Yup, it will be nonstop drama, this is why we need to bail NOW. OBTW, Bernie launches today. NYC_SKP May 2015 #13

it's beginning to look like the president's in on some nefarious shit as well Doctor_J May 2015 #14

This Clinton Foundation stuff has come out incredibly early BrotherIvan May 2015 #16

Political Tactic? Get the "Dirt Out There Early" and it will DIE before Election Time? KoKo May 2015 #83

Perhaps, I am a little sceptical BrotherIvan May 2015 #84

Obama Robbins May 2015 #28

She could (and did) by not abiding by the disclosure agreement she had with the White House. AtomicKitten May 2015 #70

Oh Boy. bvar22 May 2015 #77

but they're sorry AtomicKitten May 2015 #78

Oy. hifiguy May 2015 #33

I find it incredibly sad BrotherIvan May 2015 #37

When you sell out that completely hifiguy May 2015 #47

Yes, it is BrotherIvan May 2015 #50

This is Amurika. EVERYONE gets weapons deals, whether they want them or not. n/t Orsino May 2015 #15

$1/4 mil.here; $5 mil. there - my god how the blood money rolls in! Divernan May 2015 #17

You have to admit, it's a brilliant way to "manage" money and influence. NYC_SKP May 2015 #21

Yep. If this is considered corruption then all American politicians are beyond corrupt....more nothing. Fred Sanders May 2015 #36

Non sequitor BrotherIvan May 2015 #38

Non-scandal. Again. How many now, I lost count. Republicans must be loving the divide, the conquer part comes later. Fred Sanders May 2015 #40

Acting like it's not happening doesn't accomplish much of anything BrotherIvan May 2015 #43

You could have posted word for word the same thing for each of the last 12 weeks of assorted "scandals".... and it would be as Fred Sanders May 2015 #44

I am not attacking Clinton as a person BrotherIvan May 2015 #49

Just another Bernie-ite doing the devils(republicans)work workinclasszero May 2015 #64

This type of thing is the *reason* people support Sanders over Clinton in the first place Fumesucker May 2015 #45

you mean Sanders has a foundation too? zeemike May 2015 #46

Sanders may want to set one up, many poor folks around the world have been helped by Clinton Fred Sanders May 2015 #51

And many rich people are made richer too. zeemike May 2015 #54

The Clinton Foundation has a website to answer every one of your queries. Fred Sanders May 2015 #57

I know they do and I know what they say. zeemike May 2015 #58

RW sites. Judicial Watch is pure Fox-like propaganda. Perhaps you have credible sources? Fred Sanders May 2015 #59

And so it WSJ I supose. zeemike May 2015 #62

the wsj is a murdock owned paper dsc May 2015 #74

Did you miss the part about Arm Sales to countries that donated? bvar22 May 2015 #73

No. I read that part just after the speculation with no evidence began. Got evidence? Fred Sanders May 2015 #75

Chapter 3: "The Audacity of Something for Something." Continuing saga Hillary & Bill Clinton Show. AtomicKitten May 2015 #18

To be fair I found plenty of these transfers in the release nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #19

The difference in this case is the way that suddenly speaking fees were being paid to both Clintons, NYC_SKP May 2015 #23

I understand what Sirota is alleging nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #25

...! "AutoPilot or Quid Pro Quo." And those are questions that need to be asked & answered.. KoKo May 2015 #65

+1000 Divernan May 2015 #26

Aiding and abetting and in cahoots with the perpetrators/financiers of 9/11 with 3000 dead ChisolmTrailDem May 2015 #20

"Boeing contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation." DesMoinesDem May 2015 #22

I tell You Robbins May 2015 #27

Greed can overwhelm even smart people. hifiguy May 2015 #48

More reason to keep the 28 Pages issue up-front. johnnyreb May 2015 #30

The U.S. has sold weapons to countries forever. NYC Liberal May 2015 #31

Name another US Secretary of State who has personally profited from the work they did in office. NYC_SKP May 2015 #35

White hat/black hat. Red camp, blue camp. Pick a camp and a hat, fling some crap? No thanks. Fred Sanders May 2015 #52

We were dealing with these countries long before Clinton was SoS. NYC Liberal May 2015 #53

Are you in favor of "Forever War and Interventions" we Pay for with our Tax Dollars? KoKo May 2015 #67

Just curious what do you gain by bashing Hillary? upaloopa May 2015 #79

$110/hour plus expenses. NYC_SKP May 2015 #80

But you are wrong about Hillary. upaloopa May 2015 #85

another fake drama azureblue May 2015 #32

She has a scary amount of baggage. nt LittleBlue May 2015 #34

Already debunked to death in this thread.... MaggieD May 2015 #39

$130 million in speaking fees were debunked, I must have missed that. NYC_SKP May 2015 #55

Read your own subject header MaggieD May 2015 #56

She got close to 20 million speaking in four cities up here ........ how could that figure not be polly7 May 2015 #66

...1 KoKo May 2015 #68

Thanks for the link ...I forgot to K & R that one. L0oniX May 2015 #72

Another day, another attack, just another brick in the wall. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #42

For Hillary Clinton and Boeing, a beneficial relationship antigop May 2015 #69

Got attacked for this earlier today because of the info source. Glad to see Huffy go with this story L0oniX May 2015 #71