General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Repressive Regimes Donated to Clinton Foundation, Got Federal Approval for Arms Deals [View all]A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)same tune as Clinton, neither she or Sanders had to change the record. And why would all those democrats give to a third party candidate instead of the Democratic candidate, the plot thickens. And a good thing they all gave Sanders so much money, he only won with 71% of the vote over 50% more than his main opponent. probably would have lost if not for all the bucks. And just how many bucks are we talking about? Must be a fortune huh? Seems as if it was only 6% of the total raised by Bernie where the money from individuals was 93%. I'm sure that 6% had a lot of sway on Bernie. As for big money donations? Small donations were almost twice as much as large donations. What is considered a large donation? That would be $200 or more, really big bucks there. As for out of state donations? Well they all take them don't they.
You made a funny when you mentioned OUT OF STATE money, coming from someone that supports someone that was a carpetbagger as a Senator.
But you already knew all of that didn't you?
Gobbling it up? The only thing I'm gobbling up is your lunch.
Fling! The balls in your court. Try not to hit another one of those easy lobs, let's have a challenging shot.
Won with 71%, how many of those do you think were Republican or conservative, or Democrats? Do you think that many people in Vermont are registered Democratic Socialists? That kind of support is scary isn't it, or would be if you are a Hillary supporter.