Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: HuffPost: Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's State Department [View all]KoKo
(84,711 posts)65. ...! "AutoPilot or Quid Pro Quo." And those are questions that need to be asked & answered..
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
HuffPost: Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's State Department [View all]
NYC_SKP
May 2015
OP
So, the argument by inference is that Clinton isn't influenced by pro-Israel donors and lobbyists.
geek tragedy
May 2015
#3
Do you think that President Obama was left in the dark about this decision?
geek tragedy
May 2015
#8
Clinton Foundation reported that it "violated its ethics agreement with the Obama administration"
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#9
No, Reagan did it for ideological reasons, not to raise funds for himself, his family, or foundation
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#63
I agree and we can do better with Sen Sanders. No quid pro quo to worry about. nm
rhett o rick
May 2015
#24
If this turns out to be even remotely true then the Republicans have their attack ads
BrotherIvan
May 2015
#12
Yup, it will be nonstop drama, this is why we need to bail NOW. OBTW, Bernie launches today.
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#13
Political Tactic? Get the "Dirt Out There Early" and it will DIE before Election Time?
KoKo
May 2015
#83
She could (and did) by not abiding by the disclosure agreement she had with the White House.
AtomicKitten
May 2015
#70
This is Amurika. EVERYONE gets weapons deals, whether they want them or not. n/t
Orsino
May 2015
#15
Yep. If this is considered corruption then all American politicians are beyond corrupt....more nothing.
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#36
Non-scandal. Again. How many now, I lost count. Republicans must be loving the divide, the conquer part comes later.
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#40
You could have posted word for word the same thing for each of the last 12 weeks of assorted "scandals".... and it would be as
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#44
This type of thing is the *reason* people support Sanders over Clinton in the first place
Fumesucker
May 2015
#45
Sanders may want to set one up, many poor folks around the world have been helped by Clinton
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#51
RW sites. Judicial Watch is pure Fox-like propaganda. Perhaps you have credible sources?
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#59
No. I read that part just after the speculation with no evidence began. Got evidence?
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#75
Chapter 3: "The Audacity of Something for Something." Continuing saga Hillary & Bill Clinton Show.
AtomicKitten
May 2015
#18
The difference in this case is the way that suddenly speaking fees were being paid to both Clintons,
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#23
...! "AutoPilot or Quid Pro Quo." And those are questions that need to be asked & answered..
KoKo
May 2015
#65
Aiding and abetting and in cahoots with the perpetrators/financiers of 9/11 with 3000 dead
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2015
#20
Name another US Secretary of State who has personally profited from the work they did in office.
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#35
White hat/black hat. Red camp, blue camp. Pick a camp and a hat, fling some crap? No thanks.
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#52
Are you in favor of "Forever War and Interventions" we Pay for with our Tax Dollars?
KoKo
May 2015
#67