General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What needs to happen to heal DU's unnecessary "social issues vs. economic issues" divide? [View all]seabeyond
(110,159 posts)youth.
i called it. it was obvious to those of us paying attention who was listening to sanders. it was OBVIOUS to those of us paying attention in order for sanders to take off, he was gonna have to be more inclusive.
you know. as a supporter.
now, tell me, how well did that conversation work for me.
you and others continually dismiss the supreme court, a third of our govt, as you say you think social is equal. we have an argument why the supreme crt will be the most effective, and fast producing right to oh... WOMEN who are not covered in our constitution PER a supreme crt justice. and gays looking for some basic human rights. i know, i know.... this does not effect you white middle class men and our young privileged, educated white guys.
but, the rest of us get really pissed te number of times you tell me that our supreme crt does not matter, ken, which you did in an OP yesterday.
hence, anomosity from people like me, as i have been very expressive over the last three weeks
as people make comments a sander hater, clinton supporter, puma, divider, troll and so many many more.
what to do?
piece of cake this one. ya think? if you really see the desired effect to be inclusive, what would one do?
talk exclusivey about the economy and making it better for middle class and our privileged university students?
or passionately, as passionately as you talk about peoples $, talk about the blacks BEING GUNNED DOWN IN OUR STREETS, by the POLICE.
or the stupid ass senator in texas passing a law that a DEAD fetus must stay in a womans uterus if it does not naturally abort, cause after 20 weeks she is not allowed to abort.
you KNOW how sick that is?
not just wrong but SICK!
none of this is hard. hardcore sander supporters can keep calling me names and everything else, but, .... i am right. you are wrong