Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
18. How many do you need?
Wed May 27, 2015, 02:03 PM
May 2015
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1993-07-14/business/9307140084_1_jobs-automobile-labor-unions
https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2013/09/22/18743640.php
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/clinton/interviews/reich.html



....much more.


From the Frontline interview:

Later in the summer, NAFTA takes the fore. You are passionate about this. AFL-CIO President Lane Kirkland is in your ear all the time. Elsewhere in the administration, there is enormous pressure in support of NAFTA. How did the president deal with that? He had you and labor in one ear, and Rubin and Panetta in the other.

Well, personally, I was and still am a free trader. I think that free trade is inevitable and overall it helps everyone. But labor was very against NAFTA. And I remember appearing on so many stages in front of various labor groups and being booed off the stage because I was representing the president, and the president was committed to NAFTA. He was committed to NAFTA in the campaign. He said, during the 1992 campaign, "I am going to sign the North American Free Trade Act."

What was your advice to him during the debate though?

My advice to him during the campaign was to sign it.

And then later, once, Kirkland was telling you guys that it was going to be a "f-ing disaster," and you were going to come to regret it. You passed that on to the president. What was his reaction?

He shrugged. He was willing to take on organized labor over the North American Free Trade Act. I think the real issue there was what kind of priority NAFTA should get. Should it be one of the highest priorities of the administration in those first years? Should he spend a lot of political capital on it? Should he delay health care in order to get NAFTA done first? And the first lady wanted health care first. She didn't want him to expend political capital on NAFTA. She was concerned, and in retrospect she was absolutely right, that if health care came after NAFTA, then health care might never get done. Already the momentum was building for some sort of universal health care. He had the political capital to get that done, but the business community was telling him NAFTA was more important. And Lloyd Bentsen, the most senior member of the cabinet, and a man of great insight and wisdom and experience to whom the president deferred quite a bit, Lloyd Bentsen was adamant. NAFTA must come first. In fact, I remember Lloyd banging his finger on the table, "We must get this done right away." And so the president decided that that was going to get the priority. My job was to deliver the news to organized labor. And that was not pleasant, but they knew it was coming. Later in the summer, NAFTA takes the fore. You are passionate about this. AFL-CIO President Lane Kirkland is in your ear all the time. Elsewhere in the administration, there is enormous pressure in support of NAFTA. How did the president deal with that? He had you and labor in one ear, and Rubin and Panetta in the other.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If corporations were really people, their heads would fit in a guillotine corkhead May 2015 #1
I think it would only take one or two strokes of this blade erronis May 2015 #2
That method still works nicely on the people hifiguy May 2015 #33
Until I see a banking executive in chains, this in not a republic any longer. Moostache May 2015 #3
I want to see the Perp Walk. bvar22 May 2015 #25
Bring back the stocks and the pillory. hifiguy May 2015 #34
I could get behind that! bvar22 May 2015 #36
I'd like to start with that crook Dimon. SoapBox May 2015 #4
There new mantra, We're "too- big- to- jail" RR2 May 2015 #5
The "boring job" of pushing money around is actually a high stakes game Snarkoleptic May 2015 #6
K & R !!! WillyT May 2015 #7
Imagine Robert Reich as Secretary of Treasury. Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #8
Spitfire of ATJ Diclotican May 2015 #10
That's why I came up with this... Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #13
Spitfire of ATJ Diclotican May 2015 #26
Love it! hifiguy May 2015 #37
Reich sat on his hands when inside the Clintonista bubble. Ikonoklast May 2015 #11
He did speak up at the time but was ignored. Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #12
Yes, he spoke up all right. Ikonoklast May 2015 #14
Got a link? Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #17
How many do you need? Ikonoklast May 2015 #18
It says it was Lloyd Benson who pushed it.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #19
Reich is a Free Trader. Ikonoklast May 2015 #20
He knows there has to be worker protections.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #21
Lloyd Bentsen made a fortune on the S&L scams, too. Octafish May 2015 #31
Poppy Bush was a scary guy.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #35
A Family Thing. Octafish May 2015 #39
That's quite a job you did back then.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #45
Thanks once again dreamnightwind May 2015 #47
Actually, he helped Bill sell NAFTA to a reluctant Congress. closeupready May 2015 #15
Can I commit outright fraud turbinetree May 2015 #9
The tone is set at the top - if people at the top contemptuously disregard federal laws, closeupready May 2015 #16
That's the ticket! think May 2015 #23
I just about got dizzy reading that. hifiguy May 2015 #38
Loretta Lynch seems pretty useless. Nothing to see here.... Hotler May 2015 #22
An Eric Holder clone. bvar22 May 2015 #27
K & R Dont call me Shirley May 2015 #24
What the hell is wrong with you people? MannyGoldstein May 2015 #28
Does this mean we're not getting the ponies & ice cream? think May 2015 #41
The fix is in - eom dreamnightwind May 2015 #48
If we were serious about trying to change this, we'd peacefully assemble on Wall St - oops leveymg May 2015 #29
Well, it's like democratic ''Double Bookkeeping'' where what we want is tallied on one side... Octafish May 2015 #32
Just put the Glennon book on my request list at the library. hifiguy May 2015 #43
Please don't disturb Loretta Lynch...she's too busy making headlines with the soccer scandal. libdem4life May 2015 #30
Ah, the sting of fines, paid by other people, and then written off Babel_17 May 2015 #40
You can bet your ass that the banks have money set aside hifiguy May 2015 #42
I honestly think these people should get the death penalty. Marr May 2015 #44
you'd think holder could have found someone to put in jail in something this big Doctor_J May 2015 #46
wait till you see the Boom Bust Boom movie olddots May 2015 #49
Some resist, some assist. nt raouldukelives May 2015 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. banks engaged in big...»Reply #18