Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
20. There are 30,000 Police force units and we are a republic and this must be handled
Thu May 28, 2015, 12:26 AM
May 2015

within the state codes, county government, city, town, or village units.

Our government is designed to be very hard to change anything

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Man, seems like everybody likes to take public sector workers' pensions nowadays... Recursion May 2015 #1
I was thinking just that. Chan790 May 2015 #2
I'm very specific to cops. Don't go overboard looking for RW BS. KeepItReal May 2015 #4
You posted the "RW BS". Chan790 May 2015 #5
Deflection from my point that police need to have consequences for department misdeeds KeepItReal May 2015 #7
You're ignoring the two problems with it. Chan790 May 2015 #12
Again my point is to create a deterrent KeepItReal May 2015 #14
Your deterrent proposal is worse than useless if it's illegal. Chan790 May 2015 #16
Police *ARE* screened and trained already KeepItReal May 2015 #22
Agreed Sherman A1 May 2015 #27
That's the whole point. KeepItReal May 2015 #3
It feeds the lie that public pensions don't belong to the pensioners. They do. Recursion May 2015 #8
You keep generalizing. I'm being very specific to POLICE. KeepItReal May 2015 #10
Yes, you are that fortunate Recursion May 2015 #11
24 Years ago the cops beat the hell outta Rodney King on video and were aquitted KeepItReal May 2015 #18
Try using the concept of math... Oktober May 2015 #28
There are 30,000 Police force units and we are a republic and this must be handled CK_John May 2015 #20
His point is that the pensions belong to the pensioners, and NOT the department Scootaloo May 2015 #25
sounds like a strong disincentive to ever cooperate with any investigation fishwax May 2015 #6
What about it being more of a disincentive to mistreat citizens in the first place? KeepItReal May 2015 #9
I think it's more likely to work the way I said fishwax May 2015 #13
Pressure has to come from the TOP KeepItReal May 2015 #15
I agree that pressure from the top is a good thing fishwax May 2015 #17
I said POLICE PENSIONS. KeepItReal May 2015 #19
I know. I don't see going after police pensions as a way to bring pressure from the top fishwax May 2015 #21
Who do you think is the top in police circles? KeepItReal May 2015 #23
administrators, others in the legal system but outside of the police force (DA's) fishwax May 2015 #24
DA's ideally are the check and balance for police. But they don't act that way. KeepItReal May 2015 #26
Illegal, unethical and would immediately make things even worse.. Oktober May 2015 #29
The first one is problemattic as well el_bryanto May 2015 #30
Replace #2 with... Any police officer whose actions cause the department to settle a civil suit is Taitertots May 2015 #31
so one bad apple, everyone's pension is reduced . . . got it DrDan May 2015 #32
There must be perfection and zero faults... Oktober May 2015 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We need 2 new laws in the...»Reply #20