Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(52,589 posts)

2. A higher turnout would have made a difference.

Fri May 11, 2012, 05:46 AM

May 2012

That is why the legislature chose the primary rather than general election. To those too lazy to go vote in the primary, shame on you.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Breaking down the NC Amendment 1 vote: interesting graphic [View all] mnhtnbb May 2012 OP

du rec. nt xchrom May 2012 #1

A higher turnout would have made a difference. mmonk May 2012 #2

Yes, they chose the primary. jerseyjack May 2012 #3

There may also be a demographic component. On average: struggle4progress May 2012 #6

Correct. mmonk May 2012 #8

Republican Primary Day HockeyMom May 2012 #4

Another win for hate radio Doctor_J May 2012 #5

Yes! Mira May 2012 #7