Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Conservatives Who Gutted the Voting Rights Act Are Now Challenging ‘One Person, One Vote’ [View all]KamaAina
(78,249 posts)4. Believe it or not, it's also under attack in liberal Marin County
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_27898597/marin-tax-more-parcels-you-own-more-votes
Landowners facing the biggest bite from a proposed Marin mosquito tax have a leg up on deciding its fate because the more parcels they own, the more votes they get.
The premise of a tax planned by the Marin Sonoma Mosquito and Vector Control District is that property benefiting the most from vermin services should be billed accordingly. Property owners may cast a vote for each parcel they own....
Asked to describe how taxes owed by disparate properties was determined, district publicist, Nizza Sequeira emailed this explanation: "The method used for apportioning the assessment is based upon the proportional special benefits to be derived by the properties in the assessment area over and above general benefits conferred on real property or to the public at large...The first step is to identify the types of special benefit arising from the improvements or services, the second step is to estimate the general and special benefits, and the third step is to allocate the assessment to property based on the estimated relative special benefit for each type of property."
In short, the procedure used by consulting engineers to calculate who owes what was a complicated best guess. "Each property was assigned an estimated level of special benefit relative to a single family home," the explanation continued. "After the level of benefit for each property was estimated, the total cost of the mosquito control services and other improvements to be funded by the proposed assessment was allocated to each property based on the estimated special benefit received." Those interested in details may consult the district's website at www.msmosquito.com
The premise of a tax planned by the Marin Sonoma Mosquito and Vector Control District is that property benefiting the most from vermin services should be billed accordingly. Property owners may cast a vote for each parcel they own....
Asked to describe how taxes owed by disparate properties was determined, district publicist, Nizza Sequeira emailed this explanation: "The method used for apportioning the assessment is based upon the proportional special benefits to be derived by the properties in the assessment area over and above general benefits conferred on real property or to the public at large...The first step is to identify the types of special benefit arising from the improvements or services, the second step is to estimate the general and special benefits, and the third step is to allocate the assessment to property based on the estimated relative special benefit for each type of property."
In short, the procedure used by consulting engineers to calculate who owes what was a complicated best guess. "Each property was assigned an estimated level of special benefit relative to a single family home," the explanation continued. "After the level of benefit for each property was estimated, the total cost of the mosquito control services and other improvements to be funded by the proposed assessment was allocated to each property based on the estimated special benefit received." Those interested in details may consult the district's website at www.msmosquito.com
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Conservatives Who Gutted the Voting Rights Act Are Now Challenging ‘One Person, One Vote’ [View all]
octoberlib
May 2015
OP
Wouldn't this kind of logic let people who don't have kids off the hook
Jackpine Radical
May 2015
#28
But it would have to be accurately counted, and that hasn't happened in this country in years. nt
valerief
May 2015
#11
One person , one vote has more to do with equal voting representation between urban and rural areas.
octoberlib
May 2015
#33
We don't send politicians to office to represent just the people who voted for them.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
May 2015
#30
I think they really want it to get like it used to be, to be able to vote you have to own acreage.
LiberalArkie
May 2015
#37
Yip the wingnuts can't win on ideology so just tinker with voter restrictions/now representation
UTUSN
May 2015
#45
You don't have to be a voter to be helped or harmed by the laws passed by the legislature.
Beartracks
Jun 2015
#46