Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Conservatives Who Gutted the Voting Rights Act Are Now Challenging ‘One Person, One Vote’ [View all]valerief
(53,235 posts)10. How are we different from banana republics? Don't say,
"Yes, we have no bananas. We have no bananas today."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Conservatives Who Gutted the Voting Rights Act Are Now Challenging ‘One Person, One Vote’ [View all]
octoberlib
May 2015
OP
Wouldn't this kind of logic let people who don't have kids off the hook
Jackpine Radical
May 2015
#28
But it would have to be accurately counted, and that hasn't happened in this country in years. nt
valerief
May 2015
#11
One person , one vote has more to do with equal voting representation between urban and rural areas.
octoberlib
May 2015
#33
We don't send politicians to office to represent just the people who voted for them.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
May 2015
#30
I think they really want it to get like it used to be, to be able to vote you have to own acreage.
LiberalArkie
May 2015
#37
Yip the wingnuts can't win on ideology so just tinker with voter restrictions/now representation
UTUSN
May 2015
#45
You don't have to be a voter to be helped or harmed by the laws passed by the legislature.
Beartracks
Jun 2015
#46