Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Conservatives Who Gutted the Voting Rights Act Are Now Challenging ‘One Person, One Vote’ [View all]Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)12. What next, reverting to counting only property owners? n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Conservatives Who Gutted the Voting Rights Act Are Now Challenging ‘One Person, One Vote’ [View all]
octoberlib
May 2015
OP
Wouldn't this kind of logic let people who don't have kids off the hook
Jackpine Radical
May 2015
#28
But it would have to be accurately counted, and that hasn't happened in this country in years. nt
valerief
May 2015
#11
One person , one vote has more to do with equal voting representation between urban and rural areas.
octoberlib
May 2015
#33
We don't send politicians to office to represent just the people who voted for them.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
May 2015
#30
I think they really want it to get like it used to be, to be able to vote you have to own acreage.
LiberalArkie
May 2015
#37
Yip the wingnuts can't win on ideology so just tinker with voter restrictions/now representation
UTUSN
May 2015
#45
You don't have to be a voter to be helped or harmed by the laws passed by the legislature.
Beartracks
Jun 2015
#46