Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
51. Image is important when running a campaign. Everyone knows this, and pretending it's
Sat May 30, 2015, 10:47 AM
May 2015

not true is a route to losing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #1
It will always be the time for the best candidate that can actually win. DanTex May 2015 #2
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #3
Fair enough. Disagreement happens. Even on the internet! DanTex May 2015 #5
I'm not hearing an argument as to what makes anyone think that Hillary can win the GE. Exilednight May 2015 #4
Well, my argument: DanTex May 2015 #7
Polls are irrelevant at this point, money is overrated and if she's so Exilednight May 2015 #9
Well, I disagree with "irrelevant". Not as meaningful as polls the month before the election, DanTex May 2015 #10
Kerry lost due to an $800,000 commercial that ran for ten days based on a meaningless gaffe he made Exilednight May 2015 #11
Yet for some reason, you don't see many politicians turning down money. DanTex May 2015 #13
What do politicians do with most of that money? The majority of that money is Exilednight May 2015 #15
They spend it on, uh, campaigning. DanTex May 2015 #18
Let's take these one by one. Exilednight May 2015 #27
Well, you haven't answered my question. DanTex May 2015 #30
I would argue that is the exact reason. Hillary wouldn't be Exilednight May 2015 #33
OK, well it seems to that the much more logical explanation is that it takes money to win big DanTex May 2015 #38
have you seen the van? I guarantee you it costs more than I made in the Exilednight May 2015 #44
No. I'm sure it's a nice van. Does this actually matter? DanTex May 2015 #47
Image is everything. She could fly coach and it would be cheaper. Exilednight May 2015 #49
Image is important when running a campaign. Everyone knows this, and pretending it's DanTex May 2015 #51
That depends. Focusing too much on image can make you appear out of touch. Just ask Exilednight May 2015 #53
Sure, but there's no evidence whatsoever that Hillary is at risk. DanTex May 2015 #56
Americans think capitalism is a bad word. Why do polls Exilednight May 2015 #59
Umm, really? Of course, I forgot that you don't believe in polls. DanTex May 2015 #63
It's obvious you've never been involved in a national campaign. Professional consultants Exilednight May 2015 #64
It's also obvious that you haven't either. At least not a winning one. DanTex May 2015 #65
One losing, one winning. I worked in the Kerry campaign and the first Exilednight May 2015 #66
Wonder what Axelrod would think of your theory that money doesn't matter. DanTex May 2015 #67
Again, one by one Exilednight May 2015 #68
The first poll I was able to google up about capitalism and socialism. DanTex May 2015 #69
Wish they were just gaffes. Instead, she has thirty years of scandal and failures under her belt. leveymg May 2015 #50
The scandals are all phony though. Nothing sticks. DanTex May 2015 #52
Benghazi and Whitewater were phony scandals. There are real ones that involve a bipartisan group of leveymg May 2015 #57
In other words, none of them stick. Explain it how you want. DanTex May 2015 #58
Most of the biggest don't stick, with the notable exception of phony WMD leveymg May 2015 #62
Have you ever noticed that polls are CAG May 2015 #32
Legitimate question: the average person doesn't pay attention Exilednight May 2015 #46
The progressives' turn? treestar May 2015 #6
Hillary is going to win. onehandle May 2015 #8
I heard the same thing just before she lost in 2008. n/t Exilednight May 2015 #12
There is no Obama. onehandle May 2015 #14
To suggest Bernie is a proxy for Barack Obama is as absurd as suggesting... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #23
his national status in 2008 is highly inflated. He gave a speech in 2004 and somehow Exilednight May 2015 #28
I meant amongst the politically aware. onehandle May 2015 #34
You can't have it both ways. n/t Exilednight May 2015 #35
Well said! nt aka-chmeee May 2015 #16
Compared to any progressive, the difference between Hillary and a Republican is social issues. Scuba May 2015 #17
And economic issues. Like privatizing social security, raising minimum wage, pretty much everything DanTex May 2015 #19
Hillary and Pete Peterson are way to close to trust her on Social Security. Scuba May 2015 #21
I don't know who that is. And I don't care. There is absolutely nothing to suggest Hillary DanTex May 2015 #25
You can fuck Social Security every which way but loose without privatizing it. TheKentuckian May 2015 #36
Then you should learn. Scuba May 2015 #41
Yes, she talked at the Peterson institute, therefore she must agree with him on social security. DanTex May 2015 #45
There are a host of economic issues Hillary is different than the Republicans but you know that./NT DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #20
There are a host of economic issues where Hillary advocates the exact same policies as Republicans. Scuba May 2015 #22
Like protecting Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps, raising the minimum wage, and ... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #26
Protecting Social Security? I don't trust Hillary to do that, not when she hangs with Pete Peterson. Scuba May 2015 #39
I once hanged around a kid who became a soldier in the Gambino family . It didn't make me John Gotti DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #40
Hey, if taking speaking fees from a billionaire determined to slash Social Security doesn't ...... Scuba May 2015 #42
As long as the Clinton Foundation turned around and gave it to the poor. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #48
Really? To me the differences seem huge. Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #24
Yes, I agree. On big issues Hillary & Bernie are on opposite ends of the spectrum. peacebird May 2015 #29
maybe at some point Clinton will reveal her views on issues, and your fantasy can be verified Doctor_J May 2015 #31
War is a Rounding Error Man from Pickens May 2015 #37
Aside from a few corpses, virtually the same. nt raouldukelives May 2015 #70
What's a few hundred thousand war dead between Presidential candidates? Man from Pickens May 2015 #71
not when it comes to issues of war and peace cali May 2015 #43
No shit... the 8 horrific years of Bush/Cheney took away any of my doubts. DCBob May 2015 #54
Personally I think the rounding error would more likely be between Hillary Clinton and Richard Nixon corkhead May 2015 #55
Truth! kenfrequed May 2015 #60
While you may be understating things a LITTLE bit, DFW May 2015 #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Compared to any Republica...»Reply #51