Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
2. There's a whole bunch of things
Sat May 30, 2015, 07:19 PM
May 2015

to discuss just in that one excerpt. Why not narrow it down a bit?

Industrial agriculture: should "liberals" work to get rid of it, or to change it?

I guess it depends upon which kind of liberal one is: the economic neo-liberal, or a social liberal?

I'd rather get rid of it, for some reasons I think are valid:

1. "Industrial" agriculture is about capitalistic profit, not about feeding people. Some giant multi-national corporations meddling with the food supply for their own profit, and owning the means of production, is not something I'm comfortable with.

2. And while large scale food production seems necessary to feed our over-burdened, over-populated planet of people, I think we can feed people in other ways.

3. The closer food production is to the people being fed, the better I like it. People with control over their own food supply, working to actually feed themselves and others...a novel concept.

4. "Industrial" agriculture is about mass production, not about healthy food.

I'd rather see control of the food supply belong to family-owned farms, co-ops, community gardens, etc.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why I’d Rather Be a Team ...»Reply #2