Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NYC Liberal

(20,456 posts)
57. "Hillary clearly wasn't advocating for releasing non-violent, victimless prisoners, now was she? "
Sat May 30, 2015, 11:37 PM
May 2015

Yes, she was.

The quote in the OP specifically says: "We need more prisons to keep violent offenders".

On top of that, she has supported fixing the broken justice and prison system for years.

We need diversion, like drug courts. Non-violent offenders should not be serving hard time in our prisons. They need to be diverted from our prison system. We need to make sure that we do deal with the distinction between crack and powder cocaine. And ultimately we need an attorney general and a system of justice that truly does treat people equally, and that has not happened under this administration.

Q: The US Sentencing Commission recently limited the disparity in sentencing guidelines for those convicted of crimes involving crack cocaine versus crimes involving powder cocaine. Should that change be retroactive?

A: I believe we’ve got to decrease the disparity that exists. It is really unconscionable that someone who uses five grams of crack cocaine, compared to 500 grams of powder cocaine would face such disparate sentencing. And it’s further compounded because the possession of crack cocaine really is unique in the way that it leads directly to prison for so many people. So I am going to tackle the disparity. I think it definitely needs to be prospective on principle. I have problems with retroactivity. I think that it’s something that a lot of communities will be concerned about as well, so let’s tackle this disparity, let’s take it on. The sentencing commission hasn’t come forward yet with its specific recommendation but I’m looking forward to seeing it.

Q: What is your approach to the “Drug War”?

CLINTON: I have spoken out on my belief that we should have drug courts that would serve as alternatives to the traditional criminal justice system for low-level offenders. If the person comes before the court, agrees to stay clean, is subjected to drug tests once a week, they are diverted from the criminal justice system. We need more treatment. It is unfair to urge people to get rid of their addiction and not have the treatment facilities when people finally makes up their minds to get treatment.

Q: Some people say your husband’s crime bill is one of the primary factors behind the rising incarceration rate for blacks and Latinos. It earmarked $8 billion dollars for prisons and continued a trend to harsher sentencing. Do you regret how this has affected the black community?

A: I think that the results--not only at the federal level but at the state level--have been an unacceptable increase in incarceration across the board & now we have to address that. At the time, there were reasons why the Congress wanted to push through a certain set of penalties and increase prison construction and there was a lot of support for that across a lot of communities. It’s hard to remember now but the crime rate in the early 1990s was very high. But we’ve got to take stock now of the consequences, so that’s why I want to have a thorough review of all of the penalties, of all the kinds of sentencing, and more importantly start having more diversion and having more second chance programs.

We have to do all of these things:
We do have to go after racial profiling. I’ve supported legislation to try to tackle that.
We have to go after mandatory minimums. You know, mandatory sentences for certain violent crimes may be appropriate, but it has been too widely used. And it is using now a discriminatory impact.
We need diversion, like drug courts. Non-violent offenders should not be serving hard time in our prisons. They need to be diverted from our prison system.


And she just gave a speech last month about the issue of incarceration:
There is something profoundly wrong when African American men are still far more likely to be stopped and searched by police, charged with crimes, and sentenced to longer prison terms than are meted out to their white counterparts.

There is something wrong when a third of all black men face the prospect of prison during their lifetimes. And an estimated 1.5 million black men are "missing" from their families and communities because of incarceration and premature death.

There is something wrong when more than one out of every three young black men in Baltimore can't find a job.

There is something wrong when trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve breaks down as far as it has in many of our communities.

We have allowed our criminal justice system to get out of balance. And these recent tragedies should galvanize us to come together as a nation to find our balance again.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

One of the problems with being a corporatist trying to run a government; Half-Century Man May 2015 #1
In for-profit prisons, prison labor is a revenue stream, prisoner education is not. HereSince1628 May 2015 #22
Same as in many state-run prisons. Jackpine Radical May 2015 #26
One of the problems with being in the public eye for decades is.... George II May 2015 #95
Um, 21 Years? Give or Take? Thor_MN May 2015 #2
Has her stance changed? nt Logical May 2015 #10
bill's has. mopinko May 2015 #13
Don't know. If you want to make a claim, find a more recent quote. Thor_MN May 2015 #32
Yes technology advancements and political opinions are the same thing. Nice try. nt Logical May 2015 #36
The original post is disingenuous. Digging up a two decade old quote against a recent interview. Thor_MN May 2015 #40
Perhaps you can provide some evidence that HRC's opinion.. 99Forever May 2015 #14
Perhaps we could avoid comparing something from over 2 decades ago to something said last week? Thor_MN May 2015 #28
Maybe YOU should look up a more recent quote that makes YOUR point. 99Forever May 2015 #38
I have made no such point. Thor_MN May 2015 #41
No. 99Forever May 2015 #43
So you concede your point? Thor_MN May 2015 #45
I concede that you failed to make your sale. 99Forever May 2015 #46
No, you refuse to back your claim. Thor_MN May 2015 #48
She recently stated we should end mass incarceration Recursion May 2015 #62
Thank you. 99Forever May 2015 #66
Sorry, that was needlessly snarky. It was all over DU last week Recursion May 2015 #67
Accepted, gladly. 99Forever May 2015 #71
Glad I could help. Also, Sanders voted for the bill she was advocating for in the quote Recursion May 2015 #77
it's been done already in this discussion George II May 2015 #87
It was as wrong then as it is now. morningfog May 2015 #30
I agree, it is embarrasingly inane to contend that a 21 year old quote is comparible with a recent Thor_MN May 2015 #33
Particularly when Sanders voted in the House for the bill she was pushing in the quote (nt) Recursion May 2015 #81
Better yet: she was advocating a bill Sanders voted for (the Assault Weapons Ban) Recursion May 2015 #75
Hell, we need sentences for first time bank$ter/donor offenders. Perhaps the FBI ought to busy jtuck004 May 2015 #3
Prison Pipeline CTBlueboy May 2015 #4
Welcome to DU cyberswede May 2015 #20
Hillary has been more of a politician than her supporters like to admit. She has a lot of.... marble falls May 2015 #5
Well then, at least on this issue you can say the same thing about Sanders. George II May 2015 #91
she's "evolved" on this, just like healthcare and gay marriage Doctor_J May 2015 #6
Sanders voted for the bill she was advocating for in this quote, the Assault Weapons Ban Recursion May 2015 #80
I guess Sanders has, too, on this issue - he AGREED with Clinton 21 years ago! George II May 2015 #92
“We need more police...." ha ha, 1994. current thinking, two decades later? seabeyond May 2015 #7
Crime was huge in the 90s. Homicide rates coming off the crack epidemic. JaneyVee May 2015 #8
Yep another successful CIA program hootinholler May 2015 #12
Reyes, but there were many who believed that cali May 2015 #69
I'll just focus on the second quote.... daleanime May 2015 #9
Anyone have any idea of Sanders' position on this issue back in 1994? George II May 2015 #16
He agreed with Clinton enough to vote for the bill she was pushing for Recursion May 2015 #82
Aha! So some obscure quote of Clinton from 20 years ago.... George II May 2015 #90
All these hit pieces on Hillary Clinton are not going to bring your candidate closer to victory. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #11
Hillary's own words are now "hit pieces"? Fumesucker May 2015 #42
I don't even read them any more... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #44
My goal is to discuss things I happen to be interested in Fumesucker May 2015 #47
OMG ...How dare people post quotes from Hillary! L0oniX May 2015 #54
All these hit pieces on Hillary Clinton are not going to bring your candidate closer to victory. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #64
they might bring your candidate closer to defeat cali May 2015 #72
I don't believe I have every said she was my idol since I was ten. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #76
Speaking of hit pieces ...here's one of the worst to hit DU from your side of the beltway. L0oniX May 2015 #88
I would say the same thing about the post you cited DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #89
Your point? Have you ever changed you opinion about anything? For that matter.... George II May 2015 #15
Has Hillary changed her position on this? Please provide a link. I'll be glad to revise/delete. Scuba May 2015 #17
She addressed criminal justice reform in her keynote address.... George II May 2015 #25
In a president, I value the ability to be a forward thinker morningfog May 2015 #31
Hillary has changed some ideas, but does Sanders advocate letting "violent criminals" loose??? Sancho May 2015 #18
No one advocated letting violent criminals out of prison. But by saying we needed "more prisons" .. Scuba May 2015 #24
Then you have been in a cave... Sancho May 2015 #27
Overcrowded due to way too many locked away for bullshit. TheKentuckian May 2015 #34
That's the history that we all know.... Sancho May 2015 #35
"evolving" on yet another issue cali May 2015 #74
Sanders voted for the bill she was advocating for Recursion May 2015 #86
"Hillary clearly wasn't advocating for releasing non-violent, victimless prisoners, now was she? " NYC Liberal May 2015 #57
Miss Cleo is ripping you off. Try a better source. Maybe buy your own set of Tarot cards. L0oniX May 2015 #56
I doubt Sanders was referring to 'violent offenders' bigtree May 2015 #19
Why do you think Hillary said we needed "more prisons" when she could have advocated .. Scuba May 2015 #23
Gotta love that hide thread feature MohRokTah May 2015 #21
Can't wait for her pro Iraq war vote to also be 21 years ago so it won't mean anything. L0oniX May 2015 #55
Women don't have to base their opinions on those of their husbands. I assume that was sabrina 1 May 2015 #60
we have become what we feared during the cold war olddots May 2015 #29
The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants. Albert Camus Tierra_y_Libertad May 2015 #37
I have no problem with violent criminals being locked in prison. NaturalHigh May 2015 #39
I agree. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #50
You said it better than I did. NaturalHigh May 2015 #51
Agreed. bravenak May 2015 #63
She's gonna need to address things like the drug war and marijuana legalization. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #49
Just playing Devil's Advocate here ... NanceGreggs May 2015 #52
I knew this OP was about Hillary before I came in here. No Miss Cleo needed. L0oniX May 2015 #53
I have to agree that using a quote from 1994 is not fair nor a valid comparison. cui bono May 2015 #58
And, in the intervening decades, we got both of them, and the crime rate plummeted Recursion May 2015 #59
The problem is the crime rate plummeted in the same time frame in other nations Fumesucker May 2015 #68
That's a very good point Recursion May 2015 #70
More incarceration inevitably leads to more crime and more sophisticated criminals Fumesucker May 2015 #78
Which is why I, like you, and Sanders, and Clinton, want to end mass incarceration Recursion May 2015 #79
I looked up my own words on DU and found I was talking about this in 2008 Fumesucker May 2015 #83
What's her current position? She changed on marriage equality, after all eridani May 2015 #61
you have to admit, she changes her opinions on issues to fit the cali May 2015 #65
Sanders voted for the bill that Clinton was advocating in this quote Recursion May 2015 #84
Bernie Sanders doesn't? For that matter, EVERYONE changes positions from time to time. George II May 2015 #94
BTW the bill she was advocating in that speech is more widely known as the "Assault Weapons Ban" Recursion May 2015 #73
I never saw prison to be much helpful of anything JonLP24 May 2015 #85
You are very correct. MindPilot May 2015 #93
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»“We need more police, we ...»Reply #57