Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Stop Calling the TPP A Trade Agreement – It Isn’t [View all]
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/05/26/stop-calling-tpp-trade-agreement-it-isntThis is a message to activists trying to fight the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Stop calling the TPP a trade agreement. TPP is a corporate/investor rights agreement, not a trade agreement. Trade is a good thing; TPP is not. Every time you use the word trade in association with the TPP, you are helping the other side.
Trade is a propaganda word. It short-circuits thinking. People hear trade and the brain stops working. People think, Of course, trade is good. And that ends the discussion.
Calling TPP a trade agreement lets the pro-TPP people argue that TPP is about trade instead of what it is really about. It diverts attention from the real problem. It enables advocates to say things like, 95 percent of the world lives outside the U.S. as if that has anything to do with TPP. It lets them say, We know that exports support American jobs to sell a corporate rights agreement. It enables them to say nonsense like this about a corporate rights agreement designed to send American jobs to Vietnam so a few investors can pocket the wage difference: Exports of U.S. goods and services supported an estimated 9.8 million American jobs, including 25 percent of all manufacturing jobs and those export-supported jobs pay 13 to 18 percent higher than the national average wage.
Trade is good. Opening up the border so you can get bananas and they can get fertilizer is trade because they have a climate that lets them grow bananas and you already have a fertilizer plant. Enabling companies to move $30/hour jobs to countries with $.60/hour wages so a few billionaires can pocket the difference is not trade.
28 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yes, that's the macroeconomic definition of capital, and while it is used that way in
DanTex
Jun 2015
#19
1. enough has been leaked for us to see it's no good. The ISDS chapter alone is enough.
magical thyme
Jun 2015
#6
80% of the GDP covered by the TPP is already covered by "free trade" agreements.
jeff47
Jun 2015
#11
"Free trade" is actually privatize profits - socialize costs/losses...
Dont call me Shirley
Jun 2015
#20
Only in the sense that the EU Charter and the US Constitution were 'free trade agreements'.
pampango
Jun 2015
#17
This works in the US because we Are ONE nation, tpp involves many sovereign nations with
Dont call me Shirley
Jun 2015
#21
The EU is composed of many nations but it was created along "FDR" principles - strong unions,
pampango
Jun 2015
#22
The EU generally lifted all boats. The TPP is created only to lift the yachts of the rich...
Dont call me Shirley
Jun 2015
#25