Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JonLP24

(29,929 posts)
13. Oil train regulations (as expected) were gutted by the Office of Information & Regulatory Affairs
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 07:49 AM
Jun 2015

May 1st -- the regulations were sent by the DOT in December. OIRA a Reagan administration creation an agency made up of Lobbyists & Economists (read up on what they have done to EPA regulations) where regulations & such have to go through them when logically the DOT -- the credible agency for oil train regulations -- logically they shouldn't have to go through them or approved the next day which would have been December (after several delays already). The reason I mention this is what are we are going to do about the long-term issue on Shale gas production? This strikes me as the larger issue on Keystone but either way it seems oil companies will win.

New Oil Train Rules Are Hit From All Sides

Ending months of uncertainty and delays, federal regulators on Friday unveiled new rules for transporting crude oil by trains, saying the measures would improve rail safety and reduce the risks of a catastrophic event.

But the rules quickly came under criticism from many sides. Lawmakers and safety advocates said the regulations did not go far enough in protecting the public, while industry representatives said some provisions would be costly and yield few safety benefits.

More than two years in the making, the rules followed a spate of derailments, explosions and oil spills around the country that highlighted the hazards of shipping large quantities of potentially explosive material on rails. The regulations introduce a new tank car standard for oil and ethanol with better protections, and mandate the use of electronically controlled brakes.
Continue reading the main story
Related Coverage

Facing growing pressure from members of Congress as well as local and state officials, the Department of Transportation has taken repeated steps in the last two years to tackle the safety of oil trains and reassure the public. Last month, for example, it set lower speed limits for oil trains going through urban areas.

Under the new rules, the oldest, least safe tank cars would be replaced within three years with new cars that have thicker shells, higher safety shields and better fire protection. A later generation of tank cars, built since 2011 with more safety features, will have to be retrofitted or replaced by 2020.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/02/business/energy-environment/us-sets-new-rules-for-oil-shipments-by-rail.html?module=ArrowsNav&contentCollection=Energy%20%26%20Environment%20&action=keypress&region=FixedLeft&pgtype=article

More at the link but that mention alone means they are giving oil companies several years to save up for the safer oil cans and won't have to halt transport in the meantime either but both still go boom, the older ones especially .

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Just posted this myself but from Huffington Post. JDPriestly Jun 2015 #1
You & me, kiddo - great minds with but a single thought! Divernan Jun 2015 #2
Her defenders here told me a quid pro quo is crazy talk, unimaginable to them. Scuba Jun 2015 #5
It has another name. Fuddnik Jun 2015 #6
+1 BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #27
And not just Hillary but all who accept corporate donations. JDPriestly Jun 2015 #24
But since politicians can say whatever they want on the campaign trail and then do the BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #4
It isn't a matter of quid pro quo promises for me. JDPriestly Jun 2015 #23
Agreed to all that you wrote BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #28
Her mistakes are due to the fact that she has so many friends she doesn't want to JDPriestly Jun 2015 #34
I think there will be even less enthusiasm than last time BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #35
This is the kind of thing that just makes me cry. delrem Jun 2015 #3
You get what you pay for, right? Ford_Prefect Jun 2015 #7
Paid speeches are in itself 'money laundrying' 'coruption' or some bonniebgood Jun 2015 #8
The speech is the excuse to give the money. They would happily have just given the money. Dustlawyer Jun 2015 #10
^^^Winner BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #29
Maybe she could just send the speech on a thumb drive or something. Jackpine Radical Jun 2015 #33
Really? Money laundering? Corruption? Or manufactured hysteria. Laser102 Jun 2015 #12
That is the US political system JonLP24 Jun 2015 #15
It is known as Quid Pro Quo (see also Bribery) Ford_Prefect Jun 2015 #22
Name-calling, the telltale sign of a losing position n/t arcane1 Jun 2015 #26
Really, what was your username back then? BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #30
money=access=influence cali Jun 2015 #9
That should be a poster or a t-shirt BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #32
I believe the NEW Canadian minister has put the kibosh on the pipeline. Laser102 Jun 2015 #11
Some folks can't comprehend that she is KMOD Jun 2015 #14
Oil train regulations (as expected) were gutted by the Office of Information & Regulatory Affairs JonLP24 Jun 2015 #13
What do you think the American Camping Association, New York Section, Atlantic City, NJ wants? Cerridwen Jun 2015 #16
I'm sure I can find something wrong with your bookshelf if I look hard enough! freshwest Jun 2015 #18
:) Well it's dusty and the books are not alphabetized... Cerridwen Jun 2015 #20
Much ado about nothing! B Calm Jun 2015 #17
It's a lot harder to say, "No" to a friend. Octafish Jun 2015 #19
BINGO! nt antigop Jun 2015 #21
Terror, terror! We Canadians need to be schooled on this. polly7 Jun 2015 #25
This is a lie, or a good thing, or much ado about nothing, or... n/t whatchamacallit Jun 2015 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Banks Behind HRC's Canadi...»Reply #13