Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: On economic versus social issues-- [View all]Marr
(20,317 posts)72. Didn't even read that, because you started with a flat-out lie.
I have never denigrated social issues, nor have I seen anyone else here doing so.
I've seen a small and dishonest crowd who keeps claiming that's the case-- and it's the same small collection of names that always defends every conservative Democrat and corporate piece of legislation they promote. Oddly enough, the same politicians who are always the very last to the party on the social issues they claim to champion.
It takes some real chutzpah to be last on board, then turn around and berate the rest of the party for not supporting liberal positions on social issues though-- I'll give you that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If only it were just the economy. I wouldn't feel so bad about those working for them.
raouldukelives
Jun 2015
#69
so i ask, are you making people economically conservative when that is absolutely wrong, because you
seabeyond
May 2015
#30
I agree but can we replace the combat verbiage, there is no 'versus' no contest, this is not sports
Bluenorthwest
May 2015
#8
I'm not suggesting you are the author of that combat lexicon, just pointing out that the words
Bluenorthwest
May 2015
#14
And your second paragraph is the one in which you do not paint minority people as your opponents....
Bluenorthwest
May 2015
#20
Sure. Straight people often claim the LGBT people they oppress are all rich and in service to $$
Bluenorthwest
May 2015
#22
My last word is to point out that you dismissed everything I said, put words and assumptions into
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2015
#70
we are told both. every time social is brought up, we are told to shut up. we are told... we are
seabeyond
May 2015
#24
So you would prefer a candidate who supports LGBT, womens' & minority rights,
Jackpine Radical
May 2015
#25
no. i would not. please tell me how, simply suggesting social have a voice equates to all the
seabeyond
May 2015
#27
I don't think that I have in any way diminished the importance of social issues.
Jackpine Radical
May 2015
#29
ha. i simply told you my desire to speak social, and you threw a bunch of turd way, rw, neoliberal
seabeyond
May 2015
#31
you too stand with his position that even saying the word social justice makes a person,
seabeyond
May 2015
#34
of course it is. cause it fits ideally with your populist position. if social, rw. economic = social
seabeyond
May 2015
#47
But of course, when YOU high-five a post it's inherently more intellectually honest huh?
Populist_Prole
May 2015
#48
no no, really. i understand SO much more because of you all, and this OP. clarity is wonderful
seabeyond
May 2015
#49
look at every one of these replies from economic populist. every one, intent is, the word 'social'
seabeyond
May 2015
#42
now, i am going to have to have a conversation with son about this. progressive,
seabeyond
May 2015
#45