Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The entrance fee to Ms Clinton's 'grassroots' conversation campaign is $1000 - $2700. [View all]PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)75. Because to the Neo's
You do not matter unless you have much excess capital.
Neoconservatives and Neoliberals are one in the same imho.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
167 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The entrance fee to Ms Clinton's 'grassroots' conversation campaign is $1000 - $2700. [View all]
Luminous Animal
Jun 2015
OP
I have nothing against political fundraisers but the use of 'grassroots' is a bit of
Luminous Animal
Jun 2015
#5
Geez... to our rich oligarchs, anything less than 5 figures per hour is "grass roots" apparently
GummyBearz
Jun 2015
#122
Compared to getting a billion from 2 Koch's brothers, yes, $3K can be considered grass roots.
pnwmom
Jun 2015
#147
Is she still doing that "Conversation with Hillary" thing". Lord, that's a tired phrase.
NYC_SKP
Jun 2015
#2
Yet in another thread we're admonished that it's not the fees being charged, but rather the content
LanternWaste
Jun 2015
#3
No truly working class individual can afford to hear the content. Isn't that convienent?
Exilednight
Jun 2015
#22
I guess you could consider it cover for those who can pay to come as opposed to the
roguevalley
Jun 2015
#29
Well, since there is no way anyone I know has $1,000.00 to spare just to hear a candidate speak for
sabrina 1
Jun 2015
#98
So she should run her campaign the way a non-supporter thinks she should...
brooklynite
Jun 2015
#33
Thank you for sharing. But I fail to notice how I told her how to run her campaign.
libdem4life
Jun 2015
#35
No, she can run her campaign anyway she wants to. I will stick with the candidate who seems capable
sabrina 1
Jun 2015
#101
As long as he has been caucusing with them. His entire federally elected career.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2015
#125
He can't register as a Democrat. His state of Vermont does not allow him to do so.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2015
#159
Like I said above, I've nothing against fundraisers but characterizing the events as
Luminous Animal
Jun 2015
#9
So you're saying Bernie Sanders will NEVER hold a campaign fundraiser that you have to pay for..
brooklynite
Jun 2015
#34
He might. He won't call it a grassroots event though if it is organized by
Luminous Animal
Jun 2015
#43
The issue is that she is trying to pass herself off as good for the middle class...
Lancero
Jun 2015
#13
Bernie is such a breath of fresh air. Hillary could learn a thing or two from him.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2015
#121
No one is saying that. We are saying that even if all you can give is $10 or $5.00 like I did there
jwirr
Jun 2015
#18
By contrast, Bernie has a weekly town hall meeting on Thom Hartmann's radio show
Maedhros
Jun 2015
#25
Can you imagine Hillary asking for a $5 donation and saying if you can't afford it I understand?
Autumn
Jun 2015
#55
Surely you are not suggesting that the message might be different, depending
libdem4life
Jun 2015
#57
Dems go to Blue states/cities to raise money. They go to red states to raise support
Beaverhausen
Jun 2015
#41
I'm not objecting to the fundraising. I object to misnomer "grass roots".
Luminous Animal
Jun 2015
#46
Make sure no well to do or rich people like oh....FDR...ever give Bernie any money.
workinclasszero
Jun 2015
#51
Like I said several times in this thread. I've no problem with fundraisers. It's the "grassroots"
Luminous Animal
Jun 2015
#58
Most admired woman in the world? How about Aung San Suu Kyi? Nobel PeacePrizeWinner Malala Yousafza?
peacebird
Jun 2015
#72
I would have thought Elizabeth Warren would rank higher here, but I guess corporate M$M wants HRC
peacebird
Jun 2015
#89
Really, you would have thought that? You do realize this was a poll of the public, and not DU.
tritsofme
Jun 2015
#103
How would you feel if she gave a speech in Brooklyn sounding like Vinnie Barbarino?
Throd
Jun 2015
#157
Well, I've never met anyone in Brooklyn who speaks like that, so it would be pretty silly
brooklynite
Jun 2015
#160
Guess that tells us who her Grassroots is, eh? Hint: it's NOT the middle class.
peacebird
Jun 2015
#68
Is it required to donate $1000 to $2700? No one is being forced to attend.
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#78
Like I've stated many times, I've no problem with fundraisers. But to call these "grassroots" events
Luminous Animal
Jun 2015
#83
I can't help but believe that this is more about Hillary being the first woman president .. than
YOHABLO
Jun 2015
#93
Oh the horror, the horror! It's called fundraising, ffs. I got to hear both Clintons for FREE ....
Hekate
Jun 2015
#142
Is there a difference in the "conversation" between the $1000 and $2700 versions?
Buns_of_Fire
Jun 2015
#143
IOW, those who can afford it fund those who can't. I'm starting to think people in these threads....
Hekate
Jun 2015
#167
And what are the 2 Kochs brothers paying for their "entry" to the Rethug's campaign? A billion.
pnwmom
Jun 2015
#149
I'm not paying $3000 to see her. She will have many events that are free or have
pnwmom
Jun 2015
#155