Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Ed Show: Clinton Was PAID MILLIONS BY BANKS Backing Keystone Pipeline [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)18. Logical fallacy. The fact that it hasn't been approved isn't related to Clinton
taking money.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Ed Show: Clinton Was PAID MILLIONS BY BANKS Backing Keystone Pipeline [View all]
Segami
Jun 2015
OP
Logical fallacy. The fact that it hasn't been approved isn't related to Clinton
rhett o rick
Jun 2015
#18
Translation: Hillary gave some speeches at events partially sponsored by two of the largest banks
DanTex
Jun 2015
#20
This is what I've been saying. She is bought. Owned lock stock & barrel. [nt]
Jester Messiah
Jun 2015
#30
1.6 million is a lot of reasons to listen. As Dylan said: Money doesn't talk, it swears!
Ford_Prefect
Jun 2015
#47
My error indeed. You didn't discuss $400,000 let alone insist on it. My apologies on that one.
Ford_Prefect
Jun 2015
#57
It's the ultimate revolving door. Some people have no shame. How much fricking money does she need?
Cheese Sandwich
Jun 2015
#56