Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)

5. I strongly suspect those that require informing ...

Reply to Tierra_y_Libertad (Original post)

Mon Jun 1, 2015, 08:50 PM

Jun 2015

are not the ones that sit through debates ... they might catch some pundits summation or catch a gotcha moment on the news ... in passing.

So, I have no opinion on more or fewer.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Would more or fewer debates be more effective in informing voters? [View all] Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2015 OP

Plus, it's free air time. Octafish Jun 2015 #1

More, especially if not run by the parties themselves n/t arcane1 Jun 2015 #2

More Kalidurga Jun 2015 #3

The debates, as they are currently run, are a joke. NV Whino Jun 2015 #4

I strongly suspect those that require informing ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2015 #5

I think 2016 is make or break for networks doing the debates yeoman6987 Jun 2015 #6

That there is the target >>> networks RobertEarl Jun 2015 #8

Fewer bigwillq Jun 2015 #7

A minority opinion, bwq RobertEarl Jun 2015 #9

We should always argue with our politicians! bigwillq Jun 2015 #10

I agree Johonny Jun 2015 #12

The more the merrier. Major Hogwash Jun 2015 #11

I'm trying to figure out 'equal' whatchamacallit Jun 2015 #13