Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
7. Fewer
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 10:09 PM
Jun 2015

I think debates are just political theater. Not sure how the rest of the country feels, but does a large portion of the country even watch them? I am not sure, and I am too lazy to Google. LOL

I would like to see debates go inter-active, without the involvement of a sponsor or host, and I would also like candidates to take more advantage of social media by allowing interested folks to ask questions and have the candidate interact with them. I also really like town hall meetings.

I know Obama has been active in engaging on social media, and I think it's a strength.

edited: By fewer, I mean fewer televised debates.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Plus, it's free air time. Octafish Jun 2015 #1
More, especially if not run by the parties themselves n/t arcane1 Jun 2015 #2
More Kalidurga Jun 2015 #3
The debates, as they are currently run, are a joke. NV Whino Jun 2015 #4
I strongly suspect those that require informing ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2015 #5
I think 2016 is make or break for networks doing the debates yeoman6987 Jun 2015 #6
That there is the target >>> networks RobertEarl Jun 2015 #8
Fewer bigwillq Jun 2015 #7
A minority opinion, bwq RobertEarl Jun 2015 #9
We should always argue with our politicians! bigwillq Jun 2015 #10
I agree Johonny Jun 2015 #12
The more the merrier. Major Hogwash Jun 2015 #11
I'm trying to figure out 'equal' whatchamacallit Jun 2015 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would more or fewer debat...»Reply #7