General Discussion

jeff47

(26,549 posts)

55. Had to add another reply when the previous subthread didn't go your way, huh? (nt)

Reply to KMOD (Reply #29)

Mon Jun 1, 2015, 10:30 PM

Jun 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

104 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This say... a lot to me. In Dec. 2013, HRC said liberal criticism of Wall Street was "foolish" [View all] cali Jun 2015 OP

She has a record n2doc Jun 2015 #1

I just got slagged by someone with a 33 post thread count. roguevalley Jun 2015 #21

Of course not n2doc Jun 2015 #62

The first viable woman candidate for president is being careful! aquart Jun 2015 #65

So because of her gender she has to do flip flops? BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #70

No. But ANYONE walking a tightrope is doing a balancing act. aquart Jun 2015 #103

Code for you hate women DiverDave Jun 2015 #82

So people have said that about you? aquart Jun 2015 #104

I take her at her word when no one was really looking. What she says now is carefully roguevalley Jun 2015 #75

Denial is not just a river..... hifiguy Jun 2015 #2

Now the logo is making sense. peecoolyour Jun 2015 #3

Dame Hillary Plucketeer Jun 2015 #40

That's hysterical. Thanks. n/t zentrum Jun 2015 #47

Good one. nt laundry_queen Jun 2015 #60

Any Way the Wind Blows Petrushka Jun 2015 #69

Oh, c'mon Cali. KMOD Jun 2015 #4

"We all got into this mess together, and we�re all going to have to work together to get out of it." L0oniX Jun 2015 #5

I am not saying I agree. I'm trying to put together some translation of what the reporters KMOD Jun 2015 #10

Like no one has evolved? Changed their minds? Obama and gay marriage comes to mind. Laser102 Jun 2015 #74

That's why I'm voting for someone who has already "evolved" arcane1 Jun 2015 #77

OMG! What if she evolves BACK?! NYC_SKP Jun 2015 #94

When did Obama "evolve"? bvar22 Jun 2015 #88

We got into this together how? Where are my profits and 6,7,8 figure bonuses then? TheKentuckian Jun 2015 #9

We ALL got in this together???!!!! bvar22 Jun 2015 #15

We all got on this Titanic together Art_from_Ark Jun 2015 #16

If that is what she said, and I don't know because it appears no reporter covered the event. KMOD Jun 2015 #18

Now, why is that, I wonder? Scootaloo Jun 2015 #37

So the Banksters are the truth tellers now? KMOD Jun 2015 #38

They're the source we have for this particular event. Scootaloo Jun 2015 #41

and you seem to put your trust in a few anonymous banksters. KMOD Jun 2015 #43

Do you deny that she was at the event? Scootaloo Jun 2015 #44

No, I do not deny she was at the event. KMOD Jun 2015 #45

And were you a participant at this particular event? Scootaloo Jun 2015 #48

Now you are just being silly. KMOD Jun 2015 #49

If you can show me Hillary's actual statements from this event, I would love it. Scootaloo Jun 2015 #50

Fine. Should I stoop to this level and start posting all the ridiculous KMOD Jun 2015 #51

I'm asking you to back yourself up. Scootaloo Jun 2015 #52

I made my case. KMOD Jun 2015 #54

No, you expressed your opinion Scootaloo Jun 2015 #57

KMOD made the threat to slander the wife of a candidate. Bohunk68 Jun 2015 #63

I believe the chant goes "banks got bailed out, we got sold out." Ed Suspicious Jun 2015 #22

My friend who lost her house would like to know that too. No bailout for her! They offered her $800 sabrina 1 Jun 2015 #61

MRW Hillary said we got in this together.... Joe the Revelator Jun 2015 #28

If the statement is true, and we have no proof of such, the statement sounds like she is KMOD Jun 2015 #32

You posted the statement to clarify what you thought were WORSE remarks... Joe the Revelator Jun 2015 #33

I'm trying to reconcile gossip, from two different sources, to determine KMOD Jun 2015 #36

She isn't wrong. Many people have formed ties with Wall St and banksters. raouldukelives Jun 2015 #68

What do you have against legalized ponzi? eom PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #6

Right now, her fans will tell you to believe Campaign Hillary. Marr Jun 2015 #7

Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner. Scuba Jun 2015 #8

+ a shitload BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #11

Just like we believed campaign Obama. Paka Jun 2015 #23

Exactly. Nt HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #31

Got that right. Ed Suspicious Jun 2015 #24

Evolved??.... Segami Jun 2015 #12

Who does Not know this? It's been all over the place since the sudden New York residence libdem4life Jun 2015 #13

What I don't understand is how can her actions be defended. When Goldman-Sachs rhett o rick Jun 2015 #14

Really?! Aren't people tired of this shit already? We have 3 damn good candidates to choose from uponit7771 Jun 2015 #17

Neither was FDR, right? Ed Suspicious Jun 2015 #25

FDR had wall streeters in his cabinet uponit7771 Jun 2015 #96

You imply people are going overboard with Hillary wall-street criticism JonLP24 Jun 2015 #30

No, there's no "going" at all they're already there... FDR had wall streeters in his cabinet uponit7771 Jun 2015 #97

Yeah, y'all have 3 good candidates DirtyHippyBastard Jun 2015 #34

Nope, that would make things interesting... we're not discussing anything though IMHO... just ... uponit7771 Jun 2015 #98

Depends on how you define "reality".... Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2015 #46

After Obama no one is toast, Bernie can organize like Obama and work the backstage and get uponit7771 Jun 2015 #99

The DLC types act like everyone who worked to get Obama elected should now do it for Hillary.... Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2015 #101

The direct contradiction struck out to me as well JonLP24 Jun 2015 #19

I think we just need to adopt the perpetual Clinton/Bush presidency and be done with it. jalan48 Jun 2015 #20

"Bush could buy children's books for his brother's library." Ed Suspicious Jun 2015 #27

Kinda like Denmark Jackpine Radical Jun 2015 #39

I like it! jalan48 Jun 2015 #42

Speaking of which, who is the next-generation Bush? malthaussen Jun 2015 #73

There are a lot of little Bushes running around. jalan48 Jun 2015 #76

Bush has two daughters that should be ovr 21 by now. bvar22 Jun 2015 #91

Of course! How could I have forgotten Jenna and not-Jenna? Buns_of_Fire Jun 2015 #95

She must be "evolving" again for the primaries. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2015 #26

+1 AtomicKitten Jun 2015 #59

Hoy many epiphany's is one person entitled to in a lifetime? NorthCarolina Jun 2015 #64

There's a limit to epiphany's? I hope not. Sheepshank Jun 2015 #100

I call your Dylan, and raise you a Green Day Exilednight Jun 2015 #79

Believe the one that's actually quoted and not hearsay. KMOD Jun 2015 #29

Had to add another reply when the previous subthread didn't go your way, huh? (nt) jeff47 Jun 2015 #55

Yeah, believe an actual source, or anonymous millionaire banksters. KMOD Jun 2015 #56

You got that transcript from the Goldman-Sachs speech yet? jeff47 Jun 2015 #58

LOL. You know when you use quotations some people might think DanTex Jun 2015 #35

Actually , what she meant was...... Smarmie Doofus Jun 2015 #53

...which ever way the big money blows. SoapBox Jun 2015 #66

when banksters start adding zeros to the right of the first number, the further Exilednight Jun 2015 #80

I don't blame the bankers - I blame our govt. Hillary would allow the looting to continue. Oneironaut Jun 2015 #67

Disappear Hillary...Next!!! billhicks76 Jun 2015 #71

I do not trust her Angry Dragon Jun 2015 #72

This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 Jun 2015 #78

Recommended. H2O Man Jun 2015 #81

"Foolish" - ONE word taken out of context. George II Jun 2015 #83

here's your context AtomicKitten Jun 2015 #86

She read off those figures during the speech in which she used the word "foolish"? No, but.... George II Jun 2015 #87

cognitive dissonance AtomicKitten Jun 2015 #89

The fact still remains, that word "foolish" was one word taken out of a speech she gave.... George II Jun 2015 #90

the message was clear AtomicKitten Jun 2015 #93

"So which Hillary am I supposed to believe?" BeanMusical Jun 2015 #84

Poor Hillary. She has some record. Baitball Blogger Jun 2015 #85

Without Wall Street millions of Americans Gman Jun 2015 #92

Neither, ambiguos explaintions for the same old story orpupilofnature57 Jun 2015 #102