Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 01:21 AM Jun 2015

Hillary Clinton: Less Minimum, More Wage [View all]

Last edited Tue Jun 2, 2015, 07:21 PM - Edit history (1)



“Do the math about what a minimum wage brings in, in income. If we don’t send a very clear signal that we’re all in this together, the character of America will change.”

–Hillary Clinton, 4/11/06


In the U.S. Senate

Hillary Clinton fought to tie the minimum wage to future increases in congressional salaries. Hillary Clinton repeatedly introduced the Standing with Minimum Wage Earners Act to bind future salary increases for Congress to mandatory increases in the federal minimum wage. Under the provisions of the legislation, the federal minimum wage would be “automatically increased” by “a percentage equal to the percentage by which the annual rate of pay for Members of Congress increased for such year…” Speaking to the importance of her bill, Senator Clinton said, “We can no longer stand by and regularly give ourselves a pay increase while denying a minimum wage increase to help the more than 7 million men and women working hard across this nation. At a time when working families are struggling to put food on the table, it’s critically important that we here in Washington do something. If Members of Congress need an annual cost of living adjustment, then certainly the lowest-paid members of our society do too.”

Hillary Clinton repeatedly introduced legislation to increase the federal minimum wage. Hillary Clinton’s Standing with Minimum Wage Earners Act of 2006 would have increased the federal minimum wage from $5.15 to $7.25 an hour over two years. Introducing her 2006 bill, Senator Clinton stated: “I ask my colleagues to recognize the moral aspect of this issue. It is simply wrong to pay people a wage that they can barely live on… We should raise the federal minimum wage so that working parents can lift their children out of poverty. It is past time to make this investment in our children and families.” Senator Clinton’s Standing with Minimum Wage Earners Act of 2007 would have increased the federal minimum wage from $5.85 to $9.50 an hour.

Hillary Clinton cosponsored bills to increase the minimum wage five times and consistently voted to support it. Over the course of her time in the U.S. Senate, Hillary Clinton cosponsored bills to raise the federal minimum wage in 2001, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2007. Senator Clinton opposed Republican efforts to weaken the minimum wage, and she repeatedlybacked Democratic efforts to raise it. Although she opposed the Iraq funding bill it was folded into, Clinton cosponsored the original version of the Fair Minimum Wage Act that increased the minimum wage for the first time in ten years, from $5.85 to $7.25 an hour. It was one of the five bills Senator Clinton cosponsored to raise the minimum wage.

As First Lady

In 1996, Hillary Clinton was a vocal supporter of successful efforts to raise the minimum wage. The San Jose Mercury News reported in 1996, “The argument for increasing the minimum wage – which first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton endorsed Saturday – is simple and direct: The wage has not been increased since 1987 and those earning minimum wage receive no benefits or vacation.” And as she wrote in “It Takes a Village,” released earlier that year, “There are additional actions we can take, through our government, to preserve our country’s promise of opportunity for all. We can raise the minimum wage, which is nearing a forty-year low; two out of five minimum-wage earners are the sole breadwinners in their households, and many recent studies show that a modest increase does not cost jobs.” In his 2007 Hillary Clinton biography “A Woman in Charge,” Carl Bernstein wrote that, “In the ten weeks since the [1996] election, she had been working with administration officials to find ways of saving vital government services and programs that Gingrich and the Republican majority were determined to eliminate in the new session of Congress. They included legal aid for the poor, educational assistance incentives, important Medicare and Medicaid benefits, pension protection, and the minimum wage.” The minimum wage was successfully increased in August of 1996.

In 1999, Hillary and Ted Kennedy worked together to push for a minimum wage increase. As she said at a White House event with Ted Kennedy in September 1999,“America can afford to raise the minimum wage. The last time it was raised in 1996, 10 million Americans got a raise and the economy continued to create jobs at an unprecedented pace. Now raising the minimum wage is certainly an American issue and a human issue, but it is particularly a woman’s issue. It is also a children’s issue and a family issue. So I would hope that every member of Congress—the next time they visit a parent in a nursing home, sit down in a restaurant for a meal, see someone cleaning their office, or know what goes on in so many other settings where people work hard every day—would want every American to share in this kind of prosperity, and would want to raise the minimum wage.” Unfortunately, their push was unsuccessful.

Today

Hillary argues that a minimum wage increase will drive our economy by closing the wage gap between men and women. At a recent speech before the United Methodist Women Assembly, Hillary Clinton made the case for an increase in the minimum wage saying, “Twenty years ago, American women made 72 cents on the dollar; today, it’s still not equal. Women hold a majority of lower-wage jobs in our country, and nearly three-quarters of all jobs that rely on tips, like waiters, and bartenders, and hair stylists, which pay even less than the average hourly work wage. Now, holding back women is not right, but it’s also not smart. No country can truly thrive by denying the contributions of any of its people, let alone, half of its people… But if we took a different approach, women can drive economic recovery and growth, they can lift up themselves, their families, and countries, if we ensure equal pay for equal work, if we raise the minimum wage…”


Correct the Record. Fight the Republican Smears from Rand/Bush/Etc.
96 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kick. Agschmid Jun 2015 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jun 2015 #2
Bye! Agschmid Jun 2015 #3
Agreed... MattSh Jun 2015 #45
I thought she was a Bernie fan darkangel218 Jun 2015 #49
She is a he... Agschmid Jun 2015 #88
Question: Are you spamming the board now? Bonobo Jun 2015 #4
Posting someone's policy positions is SPAM now? Agschmid Jun 2015 #5
The way you're doing it? Yes, absolutely. nt Bonobo Jun 2015 #6
Oh sorry, I thought I was allowed to discuss. Agschmid Jun 2015 #8
Cutting and pasting is "discussing"? nt Bonobo Jun 2015 #10
Worse things have been posted on this board, I'm sure you know. Agschmid Jun 2015 #12
You are flooding the board. Bonobo Jun 2015 #15
Actually SPAM usually looks like this... Agschmid Jun 2015 #16
I've given my opinion. No need to discuss further. nt Bonobo Jun 2015 #18
Plenty of reason to discuss further....there are 10s of posts made just like OP's every day Joe the Revelator Jun 2015 #20
Not 10 by the same person, in the same hour, all in CAPS and with no comment. Bonobo Jun 2015 #37
Sometimes SPAM looks like this too... Agschmid Jun 2015 #25
It would be funny if everybody suddenly started 10 threads in all caps Cheese Sandwich Jun 2015 #17
EVERYONE WOULD BE YELLING! Agschmid Jun 2015 #27
Seriously. Don't they teach this or have a briefing or something when they sign you up? Jester Messiah Jun 2015 #60
LOL. Looks like the Hillary bashers were bluffing when they said they wanted to talk DanTex Jun 2015 #48
She certainly doesn't have the entirely negative record some think she does. Agschmid Jun 2015 #51
Hardly. I remember the criticism at the time of her proposed increases Warpy Jun 2015 #76
SO, posting policy positions is "spamming," but posting BS attacks over and over isn't? Adrahil Jun 2015 #54
I have the board spammers on ignore ismnotwasm Jun 2015 #61
Wow! "Correct the Record" I'm so grateful for all this information.. It's telling the real Cha Jun 2015 #7
You should see the PM's I am getting... yikes! Agschmid Jun 2015 #9
bad ones? Cha Jun 2015 #13
Ah... yup. That's an understandment. Agschmid Jun 2015 #14
Good you had a nice conversation with one person! I really don't like it Cha Jun 2015 #22
And, of course.. there are those who can't handle the facts of Hillary's record so they want Cha Jun 2015 #11
Of course, the Hillary supporters murielm99 Jun 2015 #19
Yeah thats a smokescreen workinclasszero Jun 2015 #21
One thing that amuses me AgingAmerican Jun 2015 #23
I wasn't really here last time around but yes I do think people's opinions change. Agschmid Jun 2015 #28
A complete 180 AgingAmerican Jun 2015 #30
If they want to "spilt the party in two".. then they don't want to win. They're not in it to win. Cha Jun 2015 #26
Oh, yeah.. that's why the OP is posting all these information fact-packed Hillary OPs.. he was tired Cha Jun 2015 #24
I really am. Agschmid Jun 2015 #29
And, they're only enforcing your point by getting on your threads and doing what they do. Cha Jun 2015 #32
That was sort of the plan all along... Agschmid Jun 2015 #33
They're so easy. Cha Jun 2015 #35
Thanks, night Cha. Agschmid Jun 2015 #36
WTF? murielm99 Jun 2015 #59
What are talking about? "back off"? You said.. Cha Jun 2015 #87
I'm not interested in her SuperPAC dedicated to "defending Clinton's record" Mr. Robot Jun 2015 #90
Oh hey again. Agschmid Jun 2015 #91
Kick it again.. since his reply to me wasn't the one I was hoping for.. I want to kick this some Cha Jun 2015 #92
I'm happy to kick it again. Why? Mr. Robot Jun 2015 #93
I'd prefer more threads like this about ALL the D candidates... Adrahil Jun 2015 #56
In 2008 you considered Hillary to be "morally depraved" Autumn Jun 2015 #66
hmm, more things out of context? That was a thread about Obama vs. Clinton R B Garr Jun 2015 #68
I posted the exact words, even the link. Autumn Jun 2015 #69
Okay. That just looked like a comment in relation to Obama vs. Clinton 2008 long R B Garr Jun 2015 #75
Well if it looked like a 'comment in relation to Obama vs. Clinton' Autumn Jun 2015 #80
The linked thread itself was about the 2008 primaries, and the comment was in that thread, R B Garr Jun 2015 #83
and... bunnies Jun 2015 #70
I'm not putting down or calling anyone out. I just wanted to know Autumn Jun 2015 #71
I think its a fair question. bunnies Jun 2015 #72
To my mind I really see no difference between Obama and Hillary Autumn Jun 2015 #77
I can understand that. bunnies Jun 2015 #81
Bernie is the real deal and exactly what we need at this time. Autumn Jun 2015 #82
Yes I was pissed at her. I think she's learned a lot since Mark Penn was running her campaign.. Cha Jun 2015 #89
K&R. Thank you for posting this lunamagica Jun 2015 #31
It's not bad, I came out in 7th grade so this is nothing. Agschmid Jun 2015 #34
Well, I'm glad you are informing this board lunamagica Jun 2015 #38
Had to come and K & R this after serving on a jury that voted 7-0 to leave it. SunSeeker Jun 2015 #39
Somebody alerted on this? Jamaal510 Jun 2015 #40
Can you believe it? AtomicKitten Jun 2015 #41
Yup. Amazing, isn't it? SunSeeker Jun 2015 #43
Oh, where's that violin? Someone can't stand to see positive Hillary threads is what it's all Cha Jun 2015 #94
One man's spam is another man's treasure. SunSeeker Jun 2015 #95
There ya go! Cha Jun 2015 #96
That source is a Hillary rapid response group LittleBlue Jun 2015 #42
Your questions answered -- TM99 Jun 2015 #46
It is. Agschmid Jun 2015 #52
Whoever the nominee is will NEED one. Adrahil Jun 2015 #57
So, just to get this straight, her te as First Lady is Exilednight Jun 2015 #44
Like Hillary but ALL CAPS = hide thread. n/t pampango Jun 2015 #47
The headline reflects the graphic logo....it is an exception to the rule, I would think. Fred Sanders Jun 2015 #55
K&R! hrmjustin Jun 2015 #50
Some say they want to talk issues. NCTraveler Jun 2015 #53
Morning kick. Agschmid Jun 2015 #58
Wait, didn't you claim to be a Bernie supporter? whatchamacallit Jun 2015 #62
I am. Agschmid Jun 2015 #63
Lol. whatchamacallit Jun 2015 #64
At this point I couldn't care less what people think. Agschmid Jun 2015 #65
+ a bazillion n/t horseshoecrab Jun 2015 #67
+1 Bobbie Jo Jun 2015 #79
You can support one person without trashing another. Lancero Jun 2015 #73
Yup. Agschmid Jun 2015 #74
Thank you. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #78
kick & recommended. William769 Jun 2015 #84
KnR sheshe2 Jun 2015 #85
It is sad when some can not see the forest for the trees, in this case the forest apparently Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #86
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton: Less Min...