Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton: Less Minimum, More Wage [View all]SunSeeker
(58,340 posts)39. Had to come and K & R this after serving on a jury that voted 7-0 to leave it.
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Tue Jun 2, 2015, 03:20 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
HILLARY CLINTON: LESS MINIMUM, MORE WAGE
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026765972
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
The author of this thread has posted seven different threads into GD from the same Website in a spam type fashion. I believe that this breeches the Terms of Service which states:
"No spammers.
Do not spam Democratic Underground with commercial advertising or promotions."
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jun 2, 2015, 03:37 AM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Vote to leave. But seriously, lay off the caps. Bad form.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Irritating cut
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Ridiculous alert.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: LOL.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Cannot reply to automated messages
Alert abuseDelete this DU Mail
On Tue Jun 2, 2015, 03:20 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
HILLARY CLINTON: LESS MINIMUM, MORE WAGE
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026765972
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
The author of this thread has posted seven different threads into GD from the same Website in a spam type fashion. I believe that this breeches the Terms of Service which states:
"No spammers.
Do not spam Democratic Underground with commercial advertising or promotions."
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jun 2, 2015, 03:37 AM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Vote to leave. But seriously, lay off the caps. Bad form.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Irritating cut
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Ridiculous alert.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: LOL.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Cannot reply to automated messages
Alert abuseDelete this DU Mail
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Plenty of reason to discuss further....there are 10s of posts made just like OP's every day
Joe the Revelator
Jun 2015
#20
Seriously. Don't they teach this or have a briefing or something when they sign you up?
Jester Messiah
Jun 2015
#60
LOL. Looks like the Hillary bashers were bluffing when they said they wanted to talk
DanTex
Jun 2015
#48
SO, posting policy positions is "spamming," but posting BS attacks over and over isn't?
Adrahil
Jun 2015
#54
Wow! "Correct the Record" I'm so grateful for all this information.. It's telling the real
Cha
Jun 2015
#7
And, of course.. there are those who can't handle the facts of Hillary's record so they want
Cha
Jun 2015
#11
I wasn't really here last time around but yes I do think people's opinions change.
Agschmid
Jun 2015
#28
If they want to "spilt the party in two".. then they don't want to win. They're not in it to win.
Cha
Jun 2015
#26
Oh, yeah.. that's why the OP is posting all these information fact-packed Hillary OPs.. he was tired
Cha
Jun 2015
#24
And, they're only enforcing your point by getting on your threads and doing what they do.
Cha
Jun 2015
#32
Kick it again.. since his reply to me wasn't the one I was hoping for.. I want to kick this some
Cha
Jun 2015
#92
Okay. That just looked like a comment in relation to Obama vs. Clinton 2008 long
R B Garr
Jun 2015
#75
The linked thread itself was about the 2008 primaries, and the comment was in that thread,
R B Garr
Jun 2015
#83
Yes I was pissed at her. I think she's learned a lot since Mark Penn was running her campaign..
Cha
Jun 2015
#89
Had to come and K & R this after serving on a jury that voted 7-0 to leave it.
SunSeeker
Jun 2015
#39
Oh, where's that violin? Someone can't stand to see positive Hillary threads is what it's all
Cha
Jun 2015
#94
The headline reflects the graphic logo....it is an exception to the rule, I would think.
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#55
It is sad when some can not see the forest for the trees, in this case the forest apparently
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#86