Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Poll: New speed bumps for Clinton [View all]DemocratSinceBirth
(101,852 posts)122. I thought I was being magnanimous.
I will say as far as discourse on this board my post barely casts a blip on the toxicity scale. BY DU standards it's Mr. Rogers fare.
I like me . I like me a lot. But I rather discuss issues than me.
P.S. What I deleted is there for anybody to read. I compared Nixon's and Clinton's political skills. I'm not the poster that made it larger than that.
If I compared the military skills of Erwin Rommel and George Patton and concluded they were stellar generals that doesn't mean I don't realize the former fought for an odious cause and the latter fought for a noble one.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
193 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Maybe the incessant and baseless attacks from the far left are actually having an effect.
DanTex
Jun 2015
#1
Well, if the left trashing Hillary is causing her numbers to change, there's only 2 things to conclude
whatchamacallit
Jun 2015
#61
I just looked up all the various logical fallacies, and your post qualifies for about three.
Buzz Clik
Jun 2015
#86
Ya think?!? Or, it could be that damn Bernie clan stirring up trouble again (not).
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2015
#125
Not sure that recalling her record qualifies as "incessant and baseless attacks" yet I'm
libdem4life
Jun 2015
#18
I never thought NYT was part of the communist party. Not sure what you are talking about.
DanTex
Jun 2015
#60
Well, that's an interesting disclosure. Odd that you previously referred to that one email as
DanTex
Jun 2015
#112
Yes, the "loop": that's where Republicans would rather run against Hillary than Bernie
DanTex
Jun 2015
#132
To be fair, it's kind of hard discussing the "facts" since you're not allowed to share them with
DanTex
Jun 2015
#156
Hmm, so voting doesn't matter, and yet I really need you because your vote is so
DanTex
Jun 2015
#176
Yep, people claiming that a "far left" news organization allowed Judith Miller to work for them...
cascadiance
Jun 2015
#188
I would agree with you if there were a viable non-Hillary candidate like we had in 08.
DanTex
Jun 2015
#142
Maybe it's because now there are a couple of other candidates running for the Democratic
Autumn
Jun 2015
#163
Or maybe she's not the strongest candidate after all, and needs to come up with actual policy
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2015
#190
"baseless attacks from the left" -- you mean like noting she has the blood of 1,000,000+
KingCharlemagne
Jun 2015
#193
In order for Hillary to lose she will have to lose a greater percentage of the white vote since...
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2015
#20
I would never compare Hillary's skills to President Obama's political skills...
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2015
#51
I don't cheer corporations, but I've worked for small mom-and-pop businesses and was treated worse
Hoyt
Jun 2015
#39
When you suggest that Democrats who like Hillary aren't smart enough to know why they do...
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2015
#185
Polls indicate that 85% or so of Democrats have a favorable opinion of Secretary Of State Clinton
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2015
#187
It's a report on a CNN/ORK poll! That's ALL it is, here in the beginning of June, 2015 ...
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2015
#92
Are you being intentionally obtuse? I'm talking about the swiftboaters trying to bring her down
Hoyt
Jun 2015
#99
"I'm talking about the swiftboaters trying to bring her down with a bunch of fabricated criticism"
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2015
#102
You may want to post a link, or else people will think you are plagiarizing. n/t
demmiblue
Jun 2015
#9
She's a weak campaigner. 2008 suggested that, this time it's becoming clear. nt
Romulox
Jun 2015
#16
Nixon was a lousy politician and he owns the largest pop vote EC vote landslide
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2015
#40
Neither Nixon or Hillary would win a Mr. or Ms. Congeniality contest
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2015
#70
I think the call from Clinton operative from Bernie's crowds, "Some things in your mirror
libdem4life
Jun 2015
#22
I'm sure it will pop up...I don't keep links on Every Detail I Read. Not to worry. I don't lie.
libdem4life
Jun 2015
#43
Well, I don't think it was Sanders who said "Get Mrs. Clinton here." Where is your link, BTW?
libdem4life
Jun 2015
#46
Did you know that spending on science and technology is killing people with their bedsheets?
jeff47
Jun 2015
#90
No, Obama eventually had an organization and money that Bernie does not currently have.
jeff47
Jun 2015
#96
Bernie Sanders is the new guard? No, he's just a different old guard than Clinton.
Buzz Clik
Jun 2015
#88
But, she has a whopping 1% lead against Rand Paul! And, 3% over Rubio and Walker!
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2015
#91
Polls don't mean shit plus we don't know who the nominee is on the clown car side
bigdarryl
Jun 2015
#136
Regarding some of the replies I`ve read here, this is what I`d like to know.....
democrank
Jun 2015
#165