Poll: New speed bumps for Clinton

[nadinbrzezinski]

169. For number 2 tune in to Hannity

trust me. Tune in to Hannity.

This is not a secret. Except apparently on DU.

This is red meat to the base. And if she gets the nom, Hanity and the rest of the crew have not even gotten warmed up yet.


And you are backpedaling some of your statements now.

Which is kind of funny.

But when people try to misrepresent I tend to answer, for fun mostly, because you are still trying to make it about me.

Realize I really could care less who wins the nomination for either party. In the end, big money is the big winner here. OK. I will make my decision on who to vote for, just becuase I need to remain in practice, not becuase it really matters, not on polls, nor on talking points at places like Democratic Underground. Or scoring sheets from ALL parties (as independent you get ALL the shit from ALL sides... it has it's advantages. When they are 180 from each other, that can be discounted easily).

I will make my decision on the FULL candidate and their policies, and if they happen to have a government, voting record, that too. And if they have speeches, yup. You know, GASP I know, make an informed decision.

As I said, the full public record we can find on these clowns. Fiorina will be more of a challenge, Carson less so... he has been leaving bird droppings all over the internets. (They are both polling under 0 in the MoE though, and I gotta take a limit to who we look at for actual reporting) So far the three dems have those records, some larger than others, but all three do.

And as to A, that is where you show your lack of interest in foreign policy as policy. It is NOT about HRC, it is about foreign policy. It is what it reveals about that foreign policy. These are discussions that in a rational country, we are not one of them, we would be having.