Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
3. Speculation about being a Clinton appointee:
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 07:26 PM
Jun 2015
That choice may well present itself come late 2016. Let’s say President-elect Hillary Clinton wants to reassure Democratic liberals that her populist campaign proposals weren’t mere election-season rhetoric; tapping Warren for a top economic post (perhaps even Treasury secretary) would send a surefire signal that her administration would follow through on progressive priorities like financial reform and tax fairness. For Warren, there’s much to be gained by accepting such an appointment; she’d get to exercise the administrative muscles she’d hoped to use at CFPB, and if Republicans maintain Senate control in 2016 (as they’re slight favorites to do), serving in a Clinton administration would offer Warren an escape from the frustration of serving in the Senate minority. What’s more, an economic appointment would allow Warren to intensively focus on the issues that have defined her career.


I feel your pain, using dial up here.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So...where is she headed? I read the article but my poor old iPad can't handle that site. Stardust Jun 2015 #1
my guess is that she wanted to be that engine of change that happened because she was CTyankee Jun 2015 #2
Speculation about being a Clinton appointee: beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #3
Supreme Court would be a nice fit for her! n/t KatyMan Jun 2015 #5
In my dreams! beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #6
No president would appoint someone that old to the SC. former9thward Jun 2015 #11
Thank you. If we can't have her as president, an appointment such as Treasury Secretary Stardust Jun 2015 #17
Please no milquetoast, effectless adminstration position brentspeak Jun 2015 #4
Actually, she's pretty powerless right now Cali_Democrat Jun 2015 #7
Actually, as senator, she can still shape legislation brentspeak Jun 2015 #8
She can't shape shit with the GOP in control of the committees Cali_Democrat Jun 2015 #9
She can still shape the legislation, despite your statement brentspeak Jun 2015 #12
Anything that truly reigns in the banks, would be voted down in committee. Cali_Democrat Jun 2015 #13
I think I'll take my chances with her remaining in the Senate, thanks. brentspeak Jun 2015 #14
LOL. I wasn't trying to convince you that Warren should leave the Senate Cali_Democrat Jun 2015 #15
You responded to my post brentspeak Jun 2015 #16
Imagine her in the Attorney General's chair. hifiguy Jun 2015 #10
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Elizabeth Warren won’t be...»Reply #3