Apologies for the source

[Cerridwen]

35. Who is jonathan alder? Why should I care what he says? "sexual preference"? Really? (edited)

Last edited Fri May 11, 2012, 09:16 PM - Edit history (1)

Why is a right-wing blog written by a contributor to the national review (another r/w spewing site) and one who has received an award from the nationalist society(?!) and who has apparently, uh, selectively quoted from, oh fuck it, has lied about what is contained in one of the very decisions he linked, being posting to this board?

And let's not leave out the cato institute and his other rah, rah, private property, de-regulate, the invisible had of the trickle-down market bullshit as well.

Ya know, it's tough enough to address, debate, and debunk some of the garbage that takes in those of us on the left without having to address the goddammed right-wing "think-less" tank contributors.

Oh, and since you appear to have a conservative bent, my questions are what is called rhetorical. I understand conservatives have a difficult time with abstract concepts that don't fit their narrow-minded world view and if you are what you appear to be, I don't want you to miss out on the context and intent. If you're not what you appear to be, then consider it an explanation for the readers who are.

edited: thank you so very much for responding to the complaints about the source. Please, please, please...and did I say, please, consider closely vetting those article you post here. Especially if you agree with what appears to be the message. Please.