Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

rustydog

(9,186 posts)

1. Apparently it is ok to engage in "hijinks" as long as the hijinks victim isn't belileved to be gay

Reply to MrScorpio (Original post)

Fri May 11, 2012, 08:19 PM

May 2012

That was Rawmoney's defense. He doesn't recall the incident (attacking a student with scissors and cutting his hair) but since this was the 60's; gay wasn't part of the vernacular, therefore.....i'm sorry if i offended someone? Really?

Hijinks is balancing a cup of water atop a door and snickering when the 'victim" gets wet.
Tackling a student, making him scream for help and CRY as you chop off his hair with scissors is not hijinks, it is ASSAULT you elitist asshole.

Rant over.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Oh Really? [View all] MrScorpio May 2012 OP

Apparently it is ok to engage in "hijinks" as long as the hijinks victim isn't belileved to be gay rustydog May 2012 #1

that running the blind teacher into a door - that is OK! rurallib May 2012 #2