Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
103. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz should have been kicked to the curb long ago.
Wed Jun 3, 2015, 04:37 PM
Jun 2015

The fact that she wasn't raises a lot of nasty questions about the Party Leadership.



In 2008 Debbie Wasserman Schultz refused to endorse these 3 Democrats
who had won their Primaries and had a chance to win Republican seats:

Miami-Dade Democratic Party Chair Joe Garcia

Former Hialeah Democratic Mayor Raul Martinez

Democratic businesswoman Annette Taddeo

All three had won their local Democratic Primaries, and were challenging Hard Core Republican incumbents with whom Wasserman-Schultz had become cozy.
Not only did the head of the DCCC Red to Blue Program REFUSE to endorse these Democratic challengers,
but she appeared in person at at least one (possibly more) Campaign/Fundraiser for their Republican opponents.




FL-18, FL-21, FL-25: Wasserman Schultz Wants Dem Challengers to Lose
by: James L.
Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 7:15 PM EDT
<snip>

Sensing a shift in the political climate of the traditionally solid-GOP turf of the Miami area, Democrats have lined up three strong challengers -- Miami-Dade Democratic Party chair Joe Garcia, former Hialeah Mayor Raul Martinez, and businesswoman Annette Taddeo to take on Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart, Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, respectively.

While there is an enormous sense of excitement and optimism surrounding these candidacies, some Democratic lawmakers, including Florida Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Kendrick Meek, are all too eager to kneecap these Democratic challengers right out of the starting gate in the spirit of "comity" and "bipartisan cooperation" with their Republican colleagues:

But as three Miami Democrats look to unseat three of her South Florida Republican colleagues, Wasserman Schultz is staying on the sidelines. So is Rep. Kendrick Meek, a Miami Democrat and loyal ally to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

This time around, Wasserman Schultz and Meek say their relationships with the Republican incumbents, Reps. Lincoln Diaz-Balart and his brother Mario, and Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, leave them little choice but to sit out the three races.

"At the end of the day, we need a member who isn't going to pull any punches, who isn't going to be hesitant," Wasserman Schultz said.

Now, you'd expect this kind of bullshit from a backbencher like Alcee Hastings, but you wouldn't expect this kind of behavior from the co-chair of the DCCC's Red to Blue program, which is the position that Wasserman Schultz currently holds. Apparently, Debbie did not get Rahm's memo about doing whatever it takes to win:

The national party, enthusiastic about the three Democratic challengers, has not yet selected Red to Blue participants. But Wasserman Schultz has already told the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee that if any of the three make the cut, another Democrat should be assigned to the race.

http://www.swingstateproject.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1537










The bloggers also are furious with Rep. Kendrick B. Meek (D-Fla.), who similarly refuses to endorse the Democratic challengers to the three Cuban American Republicans.

They are calling for Wasserman Schultz to step down from her leadership role at the DCCC. And they're not letting up, even after one Florida liberal blogger reported that the congresswoman seemed "frustrated" by the blogs and had asked to "please help get them off my back."

This prompted even harsher reaction from perhaps the most influential of the progressive political bloggers, Markos Moulitsas, a.k.a. Kos, founder of Daily Kos, who wrote on his blog Wednesday: "On so many fronts, the Republicans are standing in the way of progress, on Iraq, SCHIP, health care, fiscal responsibility, corruption, civil liberties, and so on. Those three south Florida Republicans are part of that problem. And she's (Wasserman-Schultz) going to be 'frustrated' that people demand she do her job?"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/19/AR2008031903410_3.html


Here are Kos comments on the Wasserman-Schultz betrayal of the Democratic Party:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/03/20/480511/-DCCC-Says-Uproar-Over-DWS-Recusal-Much-Ado-About-Nothing




A lot of time has passed since 2008, but I don't take these kinds of betrayals lightly.

bvar22
Cursed with a memory

"I want to thank Debbie Wasserman-Schultz for being an outstanding chair of our party. (Applause.) She is a great partner."--President Obama


With "partners" like this, we don't need Republicans!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What are the consequences LWolf Jun 2015 #1
I highly doubt there will be any- not with DWS as Chair cali Jun 2015 #2
It explains a lot of things going on on this site and at another one who's linked to it. BeanMusical Jun 2015 #51
I made it clear that no Democratic committee would get a cent from me if this was not stopped. jwirr Jun 2015 #78
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz should have been kicked to the curb long ago. bvar22 Jun 2015 #103
+1 cui bono Jun 2015 #107
Excellent post, thank you. How about a petition to get her to step down if she does not react sabrina 1 Jun 2015 #117
Probably none. They are pretty arrogant. djean111 Jun 2015 #3
Agreed. Never. zentrum Jun 2015 #22
Same here! Plucketeer Jun 2015 #50
You want the data? Jackpine Radical Jun 2015 #82
IOKIYAR Scuba Jun 2015 #4
Having two distinct ideologies in one Party, requires strong management... HereSince1628 Jun 2015 #7
That's very good! Perfect. n/t zentrum Jun 2015 #24
I wonder how they could change a light-bulb. BeanMusical Jun 2015 #52
Love it.. N/t Flying Squirrel Jun 2015 #93
Yes, damn republicans are allowed to break DNC hughee99 Jun 2015 #11
I can't tell from your response Jackpine Radical Jun 2015 #84
A little of both... hughee99 Jun 2015 #94
A rule violation by the Republican wing Jackpine Radical Jun 2015 #95
Ah. No I didn't get that. hughee99 Jun 2015 #97
I just happen to know how Scuba thinks. Jackpine Radical Jun 2015 #100
Ouch. SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #108
I agree, likely None fredamae Jun 2015 #101
What genius decided Loserman Schitz should become DNC chair? tularetom Jun 2015 #5
You would be surprised how you can win when you lose. zeemike Jun 2015 #15
Rahm lost us the House in 2010 and he was punished by getting the KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #20
^^ Spot on nil desperandum Jun 2015 #30
Rahm was Obama's Chief of Staff in 2010. He wasn't a part of the DCCC wyldwolf Jun 2015 #44
Oh, puh-leeze. "Nada". Why did Rahm tell progressives their ambitions were KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #45
The White House Chief of Staff has ZERO to do with mid-term elections. wyldwolf Jun 2015 #46
Un-hunh. So those progressives must have been really 'retarded' after all (in the non-Pc KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #49
+1 BeanMusical Jun 2015 #54
You don't have a clear memory of this event, obviously. wyldwolf Jun 2015 #59
My memory is that progressive activists approached Rahm to ask about the KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #70
Then you're memory is wrong wyldwolf Jun 2015 #73
And the hand is not responsible Jackpine Radical Jun 2015 #85
Rahm WAS the Chairman of the DCCC from 2003 - 2006. bvar22 Jun 2015 #120
zzzzzzzz wyldwolf Jun 2015 #121
That explains why I have to deal with Scott for another four years d_legendary1 Jun 2015 #47
Our Scott here in Wisconsin was "challenged" by the Party's hand-picked, pre-anointed candidate ... Scuba Jun 2015 #81
they don't have primary elections for governor ? JI7 Jun 2015 #86
Sure, but when Party leaders pick and back someone long before the first primary, it's all but over. Scuba Jun 2015 #88
When you are a member of "The Club", bvar22 Jun 2015 #118
I wouldn't know, I hear it's a big club but I ain't in it tularetom Jun 2015 #119
...... daleanime Jun 2015 #6
Clearly the DNC finance chair should be removed from his place as a DNC officer. peacebird Jun 2015 #8
If he's not removed, it begs the question: what does DNC stand for? DNClinton? peacebird Jun 2015 #10
DLClinton. n/t zentrum Jun 2015 #25
Lol, yes, DLC. BeanMusical Jun 2015 #55
And some here say I am TM99 Jun 2015 #9
+1 AtomicKitten Jun 2015 #89
She's on the outs with the Obama White House because he wanted to get rid of her octoberlib Jun 2015 #12
She serves at the pleasure of the President. nt DURHAM D Jun 2015 #26
Well, Sherman A1 Jun 2015 #13
Shady as ever. Jester Messiah Jun 2015 #14
"Is it possible to win the White House if more than half the electorate thinks you’re dishonest?" BeanMusical Jun 2015 #56
Tricky Hil. [nt] Jester Messiah Jun 2015 #92
left out this part OKNancy Jun 2015 #16
Which is bullshit. Fuddnik Jun 2015 #18
It's truly sleazy and that Hillary supporters are willing and eager to excuse it is cali Jun 2015 #27
Exactly! HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #31
would do the same? Has he? no. that's simply trying to weasel out of this cali Jun 2015 #21
has he been asked? OKNancy Jun 2015 #28
How do you know HRC asked him cali Jun 2015 #32
"True or not seems to be irrelevant" Fuddnik Jun 2015 #36
+1 Well said. BeanMusical Jun 2015 #60
What his spokesman said is pure rhetoric. No facts are included. nm rhett o rick Jun 2015 #87
Anyone feel like they're using Bernie to keep the democratic primary relevant? Calista241 Jun 2015 #17
Since the invention Thespian2 Jun 2015 #19
That's the way everyone should do it. FlatBaroque Jun 2015 #35
And I use their postage paid envelopes to tell them why I'm not donating. Fuddnik Jun 2015 #37
Yep! Thespian2 Jun 2015 #48
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Jun 2015 #23
Unsavory, to say the least. KittyWampus Jun 2015 #29
Time to resign, Henry. nt peecoolyour Jun 2015 #33
DNC Ad w/ photos of Bernie & HRC, begging for funds Divernan Jun 2015 #34
DNC using picture of Bernie to solicit funds? BeanMusical Jun 2015 #62
Howard, we DO miss you so DFW Jun 2015 #38
Yet another heavily slanted piece from Politico.com MineralMan Jun 2015 #39
lol. Either he's raising money for HRC or he isn't. cali Jun 2015 #40
Bernie should contact him about arranging a fundraiser. MineralMan Jun 2015 #42
of course you do. Never mind unethical behavior, just expand it! cali Jun 2015 #43
I will switch my support to Clinton if she is selected as the nominee. MineralMan Jun 2015 #63
you did attack bernie cali Jun 2015 #83
You keep saying that, but refuse to link to any post where MineralMan Jun 2015 #90
Oh, I just kicked it for you. cali Jun 2015 #105
I just saw that. MineralMan Jun 2015 #110
Oh because he's officially supporting Bernie? BeanMusical Jun 2015 #65
Or Martin O'Malley should. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #57
Indeed. If Biden declares, he should too. MineralMan Jun 2015 #64
Yes, the most appropriate response to unethical behavior is to be more unethical. (nt) jeff47 Jun 2015 #114
And it always brings out the most creative speculations from DU wyldwolf Jun 2015 #61
One of the characteristics of primary discussions on DU MineralMan Jun 2015 #66
there is no speculation, creative or otherwise. it's a straightforward cali Jun 2015 #71
BS wyldwolf Jun 2015 #74
huh? cali Jun 2015 #76
then you answered in haste. wyldwolf Jun 2015 #77
Msg to progressive democratic socialists: We only want your money and votes. Now STFU. L0oniX Jun 2015 #41
"We got thrown under the bus last time." BeanMusical Jun 2015 #67
gee, it's almost like the party's run like a sweatshop MisterP Jun 2015 #79
Disgusting. nt bunnies Jun 2015 #53
Is anyone really surprised? CrispyQ Jun 2015 #58
"if HRC gets the nom & doesn't win, it will be the left's fault. Again." BeanMusical Jun 2015 #68
that will be the steaming pile served up, but cali Jun 2015 #80
Yep, they are the ones who deserve the blame. BeanMusical Jun 2015 #115
How is this okay, with anyone? They need to remain neutral. azmom Jun 2015 #69
This is terrible. I sure hope someone stops him. LordGlenconner Jun 2015 #72
I emailed them. Will see what they have to say. jwirr Jun 2015 #75
Munoz will not decide who the nominee is Cali_Democrat Jun 2015 #91
Is that before or after Hillary spends the money the DNC raised for her to run against Bernie? n/t Exilednight Jun 2015 #98
what on earth does that have to do with the OP? Nothing. No one claimed any such thing cali Jun 2015 #104
I don't have a candidate yet Cali_Democrat Jun 2015 #106
Got it! You're still busy doing that with President Obama. cali Jun 2015 #109
Flouting the rules is business as usual for ClintonWorld. AtomicKitten Jun 2015 #96
All this crew cares about is money. PERIOD. morningfog Jun 2015 #99
He needs to resign or be fired. eom MohRokTah Jun 2015 #102
+1 cui bono Jun 2015 #111
It's kinda hillarious that the people shouting "Those are the rules" about debates jeff47 Jun 2015 #112
That's an excellent point. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #113
The party is the biggest threat to Sanders and O'Malley BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #116
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Flouting the rules, DNC F...»Reply #103