Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Flouting the rules, DNC Finance Chair raises money for Clinton [View all]bvar22
(39,909 posts)103. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz should have been kicked to the curb long ago.
The fact that she wasn't raises a lot of nasty questions about the Party Leadership.
In 2008 Debbie Wasserman Schultz refused to endorse these 3 Democrats
who had won their Primaries and had a chance to win Republican seats:
Miami-Dade Democratic Party Chair Joe Garcia
Former Hialeah Democratic Mayor Raul Martinez
Democratic businesswoman Annette Taddeo
All three had won their local Democratic Primaries, and were challenging Hard Core Republican incumbents with whom Wasserman-Schultz had become cozy.
Not only did the head of the DCCC Red to Blue Program REFUSE to endorse these Democratic challengers,
but she appeared in person at at least one (possibly more) Campaign/Fundraiser for their Republican opponents.
FL-18, FL-21, FL-25: Wasserman Schultz Wants Dem Challengers to Lose
by: James L.
Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 7:15 PM EDT
<snip>
Sensing a shift in the political climate of the traditionally solid-GOP turf of the Miami area, Democrats have lined up three strong challengers -- Miami-Dade Democratic Party chair Joe Garcia, former Hialeah Mayor Raul Martinez, and businesswoman Annette Taddeo to take on Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart, Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, respectively.
While there is an enormous sense of excitement and optimism surrounding these candidacies, some Democratic lawmakers, including Florida Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Kendrick Meek, are all too eager to kneecap these Democratic challengers right out of the starting gate in the spirit of "comity" and "bipartisan cooperation" with their Republican colleagues:
But as three Miami Democrats look to unseat three of her South Florida Republican colleagues, Wasserman Schultz is staying on the sidelines. So is Rep. Kendrick Meek, a Miami Democrat and loyal ally to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
This time around, Wasserman Schultz and Meek say their relationships with the Republican incumbents, Reps. Lincoln Diaz-Balart and his brother Mario, and Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, leave them little choice but to sit out the three races.
"At the end of the day, we need a member who isn't going to pull any punches, who isn't going to be hesitant," Wasserman Schultz said.
Now, you'd expect this kind of bullshit from a backbencher like Alcee Hastings, but you wouldn't expect this kind of behavior from the co-chair of the DCCC's Red to Blue program, which is the position that Wasserman Schultz currently holds. Apparently, Debbie did not get Rahm's memo about doing whatever it takes to win:
The national party, enthusiastic about the three Democratic challengers, has not yet selected Red to Blue participants. But Wasserman Schultz has already told the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee that if any of the three make the cut, another Democrat should be assigned to the race.
http://www.swingstateproject.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1537
The bloggers also are furious with Rep. Kendrick B. Meek (D-Fla.), who similarly refuses to endorse the Democratic challengers to the three Cuban American Republicans.
They are calling for Wasserman Schultz to step down from her leadership role at the DCCC. And they're not letting up, even after one Florida liberal blogger reported that the congresswoman seemed "frustrated" by the blogs and had asked to "please help get them off my back."
This prompted even harsher reaction from perhaps the most influential of the progressive political bloggers, Markos Moulitsas, a.k.a. Kos, founder of Daily Kos, who wrote on his blog Wednesday: "On so many fronts, the Republicans are standing in the way of progress, on Iraq, SCHIP, health care, fiscal responsibility, corruption, civil liberties, and so on. Those three south Florida Republicans are part of that problem. And she's (Wasserman-Schultz) going to be 'frustrated' that people demand she do her job?"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/19/AR2008031903410_3.html
Here are Kos comments on the Wasserman-Schultz betrayal of the Democratic Party:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/03/20/480511/-DCCC-Says-Uproar-Over-DWS-Recusal-Much-Ado-About-Nothing
A lot of time has passed since 2008, but I don't take these kinds of betrayals lightly.
bvar22
Cursed with a memory
"I want to thank Debbie Wasserman-Schultz for being an outstanding chair of our party. (Applause.) She is a great partner."--President Obama
With "partners" like this, we don't need Republicans!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It explains a lot of things going on on this site and at another one who's linked to it.
BeanMusical
Jun 2015
#51
I made it clear that no Democratic committee would get a cent from me if this was not stopped.
jwirr
Jun 2015
#78
Excellent post, thank you. How about a petition to get her to step down if she does not react
sabrina 1
Jun 2015
#117
Having two distinct ideologies in one Party, requires strong management...
HereSince1628
Jun 2015
#7
Oh, puh-leeze. "Nada". Why did Rahm tell progressives their ambitions were
KingCharlemagne
Jun 2015
#45
Un-hunh. So those progressives must have been really 'retarded' after all (in the non-Pc
KingCharlemagne
Jun 2015
#49
My memory is that progressive activists approached Rahm to ask about the
KingCharlemagne
Jun 2015
#70
Our Scott here in Wisconsin was "challenged" by the Party's hand-picked, pre-anointed candidate ...
Scuba
Jun 2015
#81
Sure, but when Party leaders pick and back someone long before the first primary, it's all but over.
Scuba
Jun 2015
#88
Clearly the DNC finance chair should be removed from his place as a DNC officer.
peacebird
Jun 2015
#8
If he's not removed, it begs the question: what does DNC stand for? DNClinton?
peacebird
Jun 2015
#10
She's on the outs with the Obama White House because he wanted to get rid of her
octoberlib
Jun 2015
#12
"Is it possible to win the White House if more than half the electorate thinks you’re dishonest?"
BeanMusical
Jun 2015
#56
It's truly sleazy and that Hillary supporters are willing and eager to excuse it is
cali
Jun 2015
#27
Anyone feel like they're using Bernie to keep the democratic primary relevant?
Calista241
Jun 2015
#17
Yes, the most appropriate response to unethical behavior is to be more unethical. (nt)
jeff47
Jun 2015
#114
Msg to progressive democratic socialists: We only want your money and votes. Now STFU.
L0oniX
Jun 2015
#41
Is that before or after Hillary spends the money the DNC raised for her to run against Bernie? n/t
Exilednight
Jun 2015
#98
what on earth does that have to do with the OP? Nothing. No one claimed any such thing
cali
Jun 2015
#104
It's kinda hillarious that the people shouting "Those are the rules" about debates
jeff47
Jun 2015
#112