Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why I really dislike the Time nursing cover [View all]seabeyond
(110,159 posts)27. i listened to NPR on this. a list of women involved in promoting breastfeeding and all had issue
with cover. all along the way, they were promoting the ideas you are. but all had issue with the cover. and the words... are you mom enough... or whatever. all thought they did the cover in a manner that was least conducive to promoting breast feeding for toddlers.
i was thinking while listen, and it is a promotion of attachment parenting. this cover is a detached visual of breastfeeding promoting attachment.
if you look at the other pictures to choose from, they more promoted what you are. this is the least connected picture of them all. i have a link in the post above here. she was sitting, with the child on her lap and that was more welcoming.
i did enjoy the NPR program.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
ya.... but, it will be in a mud pit of wrestling with torn clothes.... gotta keep it real for the
seabeyond
May 2012
#8
right. along with calis OP. so into breatfeeding and the nature of it all. keep your fuckin hands
seabeyond
May 2012
#5
as a mom that sees a higher in all things, even things that are not good... i can easily see
seabeyond
May 2012
#10
you need to add this link. an understanding the choices they had for a cover, and why.....
seabeyond
May 2012
#17
that is what i posted just now, below. that picture showed attachment. this is detached "attachment"
seabeyond
May 2012
#29
One of our neighbor's kids was that tall at 3. And my own daughter wasn't far behind. n/t
gkhouston
May 2012
#42
The kid is 3. I heard that crap all of my daughter's life. She is full grown now at age 22
Luminous Animal
May 2012
#65
i listened to NPR on this. a list of women involved in promoting breastfeeding and all had issue
seabeyond
May 2012
#27
What if it were a feminine mom in a nice skirt and blouse and a blonde, ringleted, innocent-looking
seabeyond
May 2012
#34
so you are saying it is better that we are seeing the son breast feed than a daughter?
seabeyond
May 2012
#55
"What if it were a feminine mom in a nice skirt and blouse and a blonde, ringleted, innocent-looking
FedUpWithIt All
May 2012
#47
Take the "toddler" out of it and she can strip to naked...it's not about boobies or "nip slips"
cr8tvlde
May 2012
#62
yes. by once again, pitting women against women. nothing new there. but hey....
seabeyond
May 2012
#41
Here's my problem with this cover. I bottle fed one of my kids and breastfed the other.
ScreamingMeemie
May 2012
#44
There is nothing "real" or "artsy" about having a photo of a young boy and his mother
cr8tvlde
May 2012
#57
one of the niftiest about husband, that to this day i value and appreciate. 3 yr old. never saying
seabeyond
May 2012
#95
I wonder how "extended breast-feeders" feel about kids with bottles at 3-7 years old.
joshcryer
May 2012
#60
Grr. I hate that little brat. He's one step below Joffery on my list of characters who need to die.
white_wolf
May 2012
#69
The whole attachment parenting things creeps me out and makes me worry about the future
alarimer
May 2012
#90