Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
16. It doesn't matter
Thu Jun 4, 2015, 08:38 AM
Jun 2015

If some city somewhere had a death penalty for jaywalking, then nobody is going to care if someone otherwise odious is charged and executed for jaywalking.

It's that way with a lot of laws. In this instance, any observation along the lines of "how can you be charged with a crime for withdrawing money from your own bank account for a lawful purpose" equates to "Oh, so you are defending a pedophile now?"

Oddly, nobody says, "Oh so you are defending a rapist" in the context of reading someone their "Miranda rights" when a suspect is arrested. I'd bet that practically nobody at DU knows what Ernesto Miranda actually did, and of which he was convicted even when his self-incriminating statements were excluded from evidence.

Whether or not a law, or its enforcement, is reasonable, is simply not an objective question. Most people, and that includes most people on DU, are going to want to know who is being charged. The most handy example of that in regular action here at DU is the situation with Julian Assange and the Swedish criminal procedure. Whether or not Swedish laws on sex crimes, or Swedish prosecution mechanism are, or are not reasonable, is entirely dependent on what you think of Julian Assange in the first place. Observing those threads, that is the only distinguishing factor among participants.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Im wondering why the blackmailer mgcgulfcoast Jun 2015 #1
I thought of that question too. FarPoint Jun 2015 #2
because there has to be a victim - and denny has not made that claim DrDan Jun 2015 #6
Because it might not be blackmail. Vinca Jun 2015 #12
I wonder if "person A" reported the payments as income JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2015 #17
And it is still possible that Denny will plead and make a deal. yellowcanine Jun 2015 #24
His reputation (such as it was) is in shreds ... JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2015 #27
I wondered about that, too. Vinca Jun 2015 #35
Depends on the terms of the agreement jberryhill Jun 2015 #38
Insufficient evidence jberryhill Jun 2015 #14
Tax question: JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2015 #29
1099's are for independent contractors jberryhill Jun 2015 #32
Thanks! Good clear answer. nt JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2015 #36
Timing also matters jberryhill Jun 2015 #39
Good - he and his goons wanted over-criminalization for ordinary people malaise Jun 2015 #3
Agreed, but let's also use this to keep the conversation going..... daleanime Jun 2015 #7
On that we agree malaise Jun 2015 #18
BS. Hasert thinks he's above laws he helped write. Sounds like Karma to me. n/t FSogol Jun 2015 #4
Hastert is being made an example of. bemildred Jun 2015 #5
+1 daleanime Jun 2015 #8
One of the things we do as a culture The Wizard Jun 2015 #9
We don't have wars on everything. The puppetmasters do! nt valerief Jun 2015 #26
It's quite possible that like many other congressmen the bush cabal knew about his dirty secrets. Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #10
Poor Poor Hastert! Cryptoad Jun 2015 #11
All Denny had to do was tell the truth . . . and he didn't. Vinca Jun 2015 #13
Why is Hastert's indictment an example of over-criminalization? Nitram Jun 2015 #15
The Atlantic summed it up nicely: EL34x4 Jun 2015 #25
I'm afraid that's a bit disingenuous. Nitram Jun 2015 #37
It doesn't matter jberryhill Jun 2015 #16
I do not agree. Let's review. Hastert exits the House early, as former Speaker he is entitled to a Bluenorthwest Jun 2015 #19
Yes but then make all of that insider profiteering illegal rather than setting up all of these yellowcanine Jun 2015 #23
The people who can make it illegal are the ones profitting from it now. nt valerief Jun 2015 #30
The reporting requirements aren't some form of entrapment. Jim Lane Jun 2015 #33
I am having a hard time feeling sorry for Denny. Rex Jun 2015 #20
Agreed damnedifIknow Jun 2015 #41
It is an issue that needs to be dealt with, along with the really stupid laws Rex Jun 2015 #42
Al Capone got busted for tax evasion. Ted Bundy, caught by a parking ticket. NightWatcher Jun 2015 #21
Actually for a lot of reasons the Feds have an interest in why he was hiding the payments. yellowcanine Jun 2015 #22
Hastert's career also exemplifies the legalization of corruption. n/t Orsino Jun 2015 #28
Banking... one place I'm okay with tough laws Johonny Jun 2015 #31
Radley Balko is correct. Hastert's "crimes" are non-crimes. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2015 #34
Did he or did he not lie to the FBI? krawhitham Jun 2015 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Denny Hastert is Contempt...»Reply #16