Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yellowcanine

(36,777 posts)
22. Actually for a lot of reasons the Feds have an interest in why he was hiding the payments.
Thu Jun 4, 2015, 09:41 AM
Jun 2015

What were the payments for? Was he paying somebody for working for him, for example and avoiding withholding income and SS taxes? Or is he flat out giving large sums of money to someone and not reporting it to the IRS, thus enabling that person to avoid taxes? Is he supporting terrorists? If some is hiding large cash transactions, it raises questions. It was legitimate for the Feds to ask him about the transactions. If he really had been just hiding the cash under the mattress there would have been no problem. But he lied about that so suddenly there is a problem. He could have hid behind the 5th Amendment and then the Feds would have had to prove their case or let him go. But since he lied they have him on that.

FWIW I don't think that withdrawing smaller than $10,000 from the bank to avoid the reporting requirement should be a crime at all.
In fact I don't think there should be a reporting requirement for withdrawing large sums. The bank has the records of the transactions. If the Feds have probable cause they can go to a judge and get a subpoena for the records. Paying large sums in cash to an individual could be that probable cause but the Feds should still have to present what evidence they have to a judge. Denny slit his own throat by putting the financial reporting requirements into the Patriot Act. There is some sweet justice in that I guess.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Im wondering why the blackmailer mgcgulfcoast Jun 2015 #1
I thought of that question too. FarPoint Jun 2015 #2
because there has to be a victim - and denny has not made that claim DrDan Jun 2015 #6
Because it might not be blackmail. Vinca Jun 2015 #12
I wonder if "person A" reported the payments as income JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2015 #17
And it is still possible that Denny will plead and make a deal. yellowcanine Jun 2015 #24
His reputation (such as it was) is in shreds ... JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2015 #27
I wondered about that, too. Vinca Jun 2015 #35
Depends on the terms of the agreement jberryhill Jun 2015 #38
Insufficient evidence jberryhill Jun 2015 #14
Tax question: JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2015 #29
1099's are for independent contractors jberryhill Jun 2015 #32
Thanks! Good clear answer. nt JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2015 #36
Timing also matters jberryhill Jun 2015 #39
Good - he and his goons wanted over-criminalization for ordinary people malaise Jun 2015 #3
Agreed, but let's also use this to keep the conversation going..... daleanime Jun 2015 #7
On that we agree malaise Jun 2015 #18
BS. Hasert thinks he's above laws he helped write. Sounds like Karma to me. n/t FSogol Jun 2015 #4
Hastert is being made an example of. bemildred Jun 2015 #5
+1 daleanime Jun 2015 #8
One of the things we do as a culture The Wizard Jun 2015 #9
We don't have wars on everything. The puppetmasters do! nt valerief Jun 2015 #26
It's quite possible that like many other congressmen the bush cabal knew about his dirty secrets. Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #10
Poor Poor Hastert! Cryptoad Jun 2015 #11
All Denny had to do was tell the truth . . . and he didn't. Vinca Jun 2015 #13
Why is Hastert's indictment an example of over-criminalization? Nitram Jun 2015 #15
The Atlantic summed it up nicely: EL34x4 Jun 2015 #25
I'm afraid that's a bit disingenuous. Nitram Jun 2015 #37
It doesn't matter jberryhill Jun 2015 #16
I do not agree. Let's review. Hastert exits the House early, as former Speaker he is entitled to a Bluenorthwest Jun 2015 #19
Yes but then make all of that insider profiteering illegal rather than setting up all of these yellowcanine Jun 2015 #23
The people who can make it illegal are the ones profitting from it now. nt valerief Jun 2015 #30
The reporting requirements aren't some form of entrapment. Jim Lane Jun 2015 #33
I am having a hard time feeling sorry for Denny. Rex Jun 2015 #20
Agreed damnedifIknow Jun 2015 #41
It is an issue that needs to be dealt with, along with the really stupid laws Rex Jun 2015 #42
Al Capone got busted for tax evasion. Ted Bundy, caught by a parking ticket. NightWatcher Jun 2015 #21
Actually for a lot of reasons the Feds have an interest in why he was hiding the payments. yellowcanine Jun 2015 #22
Hastert's career also exemplifies the legalization of corruption. n/t Orsino Jun 2015 #28
Banking... one place I'm okay with tough laws Johonny Jun 2015 #31
Radley Balko is correct. Hastert's "crimes" are non-crimes. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2015 #34
Did he or did he not lie to the FBI? krawhitham Jun 2015 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Denny Hastert is Contempt...»Reply #22