Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Just curious about what your thoughts are on the number of Republican candidates. [View all]Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)105. They don't need to beat her.
They already bought her.
WASHINGTON -- Two Canadian banks tightly connected to promoting the controversial Keystone XL pipeline in the United States either fully or partially paid for eight speeches made by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the period not long before she announced her campaign for president. Those speeches put more than $1.6 million in the Democratic candidate's pocket.
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and TD Bank were both primary sponsors of paid Clinton speeches in 2014 and early 2015, although only the former appears on the financial disclosure form she filed May 15. According to that document, CIBC paid Clinton $150,000 for a speech she gave in Whistler, British Columbia, on Jan. 22, 2015.
Clinton reported that another five speeches she gave across Canada were paid for by tinePublic Inc., a promotional company known for hosting speeches by world leaders and celebrities. Another speech was reported as paid for by the think tank Canada 2020, while yet another speech was reportedly funded by the Vancouver Board of Trade. But a review of invitations, press releases and media reports for those seven other speeches reveals that they, too, were either sponsored by or directly involved the two banks.
Both banks have financial ties to TransCanada, the company behind the Keystone XL pipeline, and have advocated for a massive increase in pipeline capacity, including construction of Keystone. Further, Gordon Giffin, a CIBC board member and onetime U.S. ambassador to Canada, is a former lobbyist for TransCanada and was a contributions bundler for Clintons 2008 presidential campaign.
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and TD Bank were both primary sponsors of paid Clinton speeches in 2014 and early 2015, although only the former appears on the financial disclosure form she filed May 15. According to that document, CIBC paid Clinton $150,000 for a speech she gave in Whistler, British Columbia, on Jan. 22, 2015.
Clinton reported that another five speeches she gave across Canada were paid for by tinePublic Inc., a promotional company known for hosting speeches by world leaders and celebrities. Another speech was reported as paid for by the think tank Canada 2020, while yet another speech was reportedly funded by the Vancouver Board of Trade. But a review of invitations, press releases and media reports for those seven other speeches reveals that they, too, were either sponsored by or directly involved the two banks.
Both banks have financial ties to TransCanada, the company behind the Keystone XL pipeline, and have advocated for a massive increase in pipeline capacity, including construction of Keystone. Further, Gordon Giffin, a CIBC board member and onetime U.S. ambassador to Canada, is a former lobbyist for TransCanada and was a contributions bundler for Clintons 2008 presidential campaign.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/31/hillary-clinton-speeches-keystone_n_7463108.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
152 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just curious about what your thoughts are on the number of Republican candidates. [View all]
marym625
Jun 2015
OP
Desperately throwing any and all shit against the wall to see what sticks?
Populist_Prole
Jun 2015
#4
They want Hillary because they can beat her. They picked our candidate for us.
Exilednight
Jun 2015
#51
Independents are unaffiliated voters. Some of them are too far right or too far left
Agnosticsherbet
Jun 2015
#126
Remember in 2008 how Bush was so horrible that America went and elected its first black president?
CBGLuthier
Jun 2015
#36
The RNC knows an idiot like Perry, kooks like Carson and Cruz, bible thumpers like Santorum and Huck
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Jun 2015
#40
Walker's not yet-but inevitable entry set the bar very low & many can step over it
HereSince1628
Jun 2015
#47
In our party we would ignore anyone without some higher education because our elected officials
jwirr
Jun 2015
#75
Real democracy requires options to choose between, they thin out quite quickly
HereSince1628
Jun 2015
#82
It shows what I've been saying for a while now: no one is in charge of the GOP.
randome
Jun 2015
#57
If this continues Fox News are going to have take off their shoes to keep track
underpants
Jun 2015
#62
Not much, it just serves to split the anti establishment riff raff up a hundred ways
TheKentuckian
Jun 2015
#91
That the clowns split the non establishment vote which clears the path for the JEB/Romney type
TheKentuckian
Jun 2015
#142
They see historical trends that would normally shift the resident of the WH to a Republican
Sheepshank
Jun 2015
#124
There are a lot of contestants in the "America's Got Stupid" competition.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2015
#131
It's an intentional strategy to water down the focus of any one candidate. Make it a circus so their
Pisces
Jun 2015
#135
They are probably just doing it for the money and whatever perks they might get.
GoneFishin
Jun 2015
#151