Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If you are justifying use of the "C-word" because someone supports the candidate you support... [View all]Bonobo
(29,257 posts)139. Can both be condemned? Or do you want to defend the use of one while decrying the use of the other?
I'm genuinely curious how you would choose to defend the right to use a male sex organ in a pejorative way against a person while saying that the use of a female sex organ in a pejorative way is vastly different...
This could be a great learning experience for me and others. I am all ears.
BTW, I am anticipating a PERSONAL attack in your response, so let it be noted that I offered you none.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
177 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you are justifying use of the "C-word" because someone supports the candidate you support... [View all]
stevenleser
Jun 2015
OP
I expect many folks who see themselves in what I wrote will have similar pathetic rejoinders. nt
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#5
Not too broad or unspecified for you to become upset. It's clearly spot on.
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#15
Yep, so silly you just had to post multiple replies including a somewhat lengthy one.
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#88
Thanks for kicking my OP and again showing how much it hit close to home for you. nt
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#110
Sure thing. Let's have some music to go with it! How about some of the late, great Eduard Khil?
Scootaloo
Jun 2015
#111
Maybe. I seem to see a lot of the same names pushing Bernie arguing that NYC_SKP did nothing wrong
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#8
Of course someone who would send me nasty expletive filled PMs would think that.
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#18
Steven, you must know on some level it is cowardly to allude to an underserved, nasty PM
Bonobo
Jun 2015
#56
Again? Whoever alerted, I appreciate you defending me, but couldn't you have waited until she posted
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#99
Wait. what? This is stuff that happened 3-4 months ago and you are still gnawing on it?
Bonobo
Jun 2015
#116
Yes, passionate and sometimes hot-headed? Sure. But a wonderful human at the same time.
Bonobo
Jun 2015
#138
Oh I would love that. I said absolutely nothing to you to justify those PMs. nt
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#33
Nope. I notice a general correlation. That does not mean every instance follows. nt
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#23
How do you explain the poll and the Hillary fans who are sorry to see him gone?
LittleBlue
Jun 2015
#34
I don't have a dog in this fight beside hating epithets and I too am a fan of Lord Occam so I...
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2015
#168
synonyms: dissimulation, false virtue, cant, posturing, affectation, speciousness, empty talk...
Scootaloo
Jun 2015
#50
I do too. I hope everyone reads the entirety of my responses under that OP for context.
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#21
"It just goes to show you just how diversity sensitive those screaming 'Sexism' really are"
deurbano
Jun 2015
#123
that thread seems consistent with this OP , he is objecting to defense or use of certain terms
JI7
Jun 2015
#37
Nope. I am happy for people to read all of my comments there. I am 100% consistent. nt
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#80
Let me get this straight. EarlG banned SKP for use of the 'C' word because Skinner supports Hillary?
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#29
My confusion lies in the C word wasn't actually used. Some "interpretation" was involved. nt
daredtowork
Jun 2015
#39
His comment and the comment he was responding to have been posted multiple times.
Agschmid
Jun 2015
#77
It should and could be either meta + personal. I stopped really alerting on stuff a while ago.
ScreamingMeemie
Jun 2015
#65
Double Standards.. they're prolific at it. If it had been Elizabeth Warren that it was directed at
Cha
Jun 2015
#60
Interestingly enough, the person who said "POS used car salesman" agrees with you. But there is...
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#84
Hey Aloha, SunSeeker.. you're absolutely right on.. good points you brought up about the *****
Cha
Jun 2015
#132
But, he was banned at one time.. just not for that. It wasn't a misogynistic slur.. so many are
Cha
Jun 2015
#151
I agree that no one should call any woman that word. However, to turn around and blame it on
Cleita
Jun 2015
#104
Can both be condemned? Or do you want to defend the use of one while decrying the use of the other?
Bonobo
Jun 2015
#139
Leaving out the most important part took the entire exchange out of context.
MohRokTah
Jun 2015
#153
No, what are you saying? you link to a google page.. Which candidate is being called that?
Cha
Jun 2015
#150
There are some actual Bernie Supporters who aren't excusing his slur. It's refreshing..
Cha
Jun 2015
#155
It's very refreshing to have people who actually care that a misogynistic slur is being used against
Cha
Jun 2015
#157
some people saw it as intended as a the lighthearted joke in response to a troll
magical thyme
Jun 2015
#159
Yeah, I know you're done with me. I don't remember engaging you prior to this.. so no you're not
Cha
Jun 2015
#161
Lots of false claims in your op. I've only seen two people justifying it, So your op is mystifying.
cali
Jun 2015
#149
Ah, yes, the Rightwing gungeoneer brilliant debating tactic: pretend to be stupid.
ieoeja
Jun 2015
#177