General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sorry folks there is disability fraud [View all]daredtowork
(3,732 posts)If we had the "Mincome", there wouldn't be all this petty fear-mongering over "fraud" and "waste" among people who went through 3 years of bureaucratic and medical qualification for less than $900/month to live on - because that's the only way they could survive.
If we had the Mincome, there would be no more issue about means-testing for seniors or raising the retirement age. People would retire when they felt ready to retire.
If we had the Mincome, there would be no more "welfare" and no more stigma attached to interaction with poverty bureaucracies.
If we had the Mincome, the taxpayer would be saving a HELLUVA a lot of money on poverty, social regulation, and fraud investigation bureaucracies. In fact the biggest opposition may come from people who would lose their fat incomes and pensions in this sector. The Mincome would be a lot less than the standard bureaucratic income. It might take a while for Americans to switch over to building their own businesses on top of the Mincome. Or perhaps we could, as a society, decide we wanted our Federal Government to create institutions out than Poverty Bureaucracies. Anyone remember the National Endowment for the Arts? We could just shift the money/jobs elsewhere.
If we had the Mincome, people would have autonomy and choice in an era of rapid technology change. People would be able to maintain their housing while they sought re-education.
If we had the Mincome, a broader base of people would have money to spend within their local economies: money would be circulating rather than just be an abstract idea sitting in the Swiss bank accounts of the Super Rich.
Leave it to the GOP Clown Car to play Judge Judy on Fox News. Democrats should be about offering real solutions for real problems. Bring on the Mincome.