General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The latest "banning" (NYC_SKP) is an interesting lesson on REPUTATION. [View all]hfojvt
(37,573 posts)"I am not one of those weak women" was NOT, in my view, written to attack other women as weak. It was pre-emptive. It was a DEFENSE against an expected argument like "you are not ready to goto battle over the C-word? Then you are weak."
As I am reading this subthread I am seeing a lot of "I read that as an attack".
Whether the "misinterpretation" is deliberate or even a misinterpretation. Accusation and counter-accusation, tone of mutual hostility.
It should be a relatively simple matter if one person says "phrase X" and somebody comes back with "you just said phrase Y" to sort of calmly explain what was meant by phrase X. Language is apparently open to interpretation. Like this exchange that I read just yesterday. First, I was accused of saying something and I denied it, tried to clarify it, finally I get the reply "just say what you mean" which I found to be puzzling because I am quite sure I WAS saying what I meant. But so it goes. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6727266