General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The latest "banning" (NYC_SKP) is an interesting lesson on REPUTATION. [View all]roguevalley
(40,656 posts)raped women and girls in their youth when they 'didn't know any better' and they were not only not banned, I got no response.
I loathe the word used by NYC. But I also know about the moment taking you away. I also know that the owners are some of the bigger supporters of Clinton on this board. I also know that the owners Discussionist site routinely says the same or worse about Hillary without penalties. I guess its hard to say no to the money ads generate because Discussionist either has to be modded or dropped if you want to keep a 'reputation'. Maybe it is all about the benjamins that its still the seething cesspool that it is. I don't come here like I used to and I suppose even though I am an FDR-HST dem with a hard left lean and a desire not to die of my old age in a fascist state run by corporatists and their friends like Mrs. Clinton, that makes me a bad person.
Ban me too. I don't care but lets not pretend that only his one action led to this. Given the crud that gets to stay, it rather beggars the reasons behind NYC's banning.
I wish he were back. When the older people here leave, it won't be the same. When a things history leaves, no one can rightfully and accurately tell the truth about a place. I won't link to the posts about the rapists. Its in archives and is about a year or two back.
Sue me. Ban me. I miss you, NYC.
RV