Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pooka Fey

(3,496 posts)
20. You mean did it run before 2015, 7 years after the 2008 financial crises, right?
Sat Jun 6, 2015, 11:51 AM
Jun 2015

Why would it have?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Haven't there always been "hidden" unemployed?? DCBob Jun 2015 #1
No, everything bad started when Obama became president Democat Jun 2015 #2
You forgot the sarcasm gif, right? nt brush Jun 2015 #3
Seems alot of people want to change the way we calculate unemployment now. DCBob Jun 2015 #4
I don't know who those people are. raouldukelives Jun 2015 #17
I think its simply a very difficult number to determine accurately. DCBob Jun 2015 #18
Infaltion rates that don't include food or energy, CrispyQ Jun 2015 #23
Crazy, right? And yet, they always seem to be telling us to live in reality. Yikes! nt raouldukelives Jun 2015 #39
Yes, the CPI includes food and energy. I wish this zombie would die Recursion Jun 2015 #41
The cartoon never even mentioned Obama nxylas Jun 2015 #5
It suggests the government is not taking into account the millions of "hidden" unemployed. DCBob Jun 2015 #7
Which is true nxylas Jun 2015 #14
Well, did this cartoon ever run prior to the current administration? DCBob Jun 2015 #15
But that's pretty circumstantial evidence nxylas Jun 2015 #19
You mean did it run before 2015, 7 years after the 2008 financial crises, right? Pooka Fey Jun 2015 #20
After six years of Obama Derangement Syndrome, SCVDem Jun 2015 #12
The cartoonist's work is regularly featured at Townhall.com MADem Jun 2015 #28
Well, that changes things nxylas Jun 2015 #31
DU didn't trust unemployment figures back when Bush was prez. CrispyQ Jun 2015 #24
The way it is tallied awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #26
No. it started under JFK. Then Reagan took it several steps further. Then Clinton. Luminous Animal Jun 2015 #35
Thanks, didn't know it went back that far.... awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #36
JFK removed "discouraged workers" from unemployment figures in 1961. Luminous Animal Jun 2015 #37
I've been complaining since Reagan. Though, since JFK, the govt. has been fudging the numbers. Luminous Animal Jun 2015 #33
Thanks for the info BuelahWitch Jun 2015 #38
Of course - for instance - when they tell us that the rate is "5.5 percent" that is overall - it jwirr Jun 2015 #21
Yes, but not to the extent there are today. hifiguy Jun 2015 #30
Yes, I am sure it worse today than before.. DCBob Jun 2015 #32
Nop. Started with JFK who removed discouraged workers in 1961. But Reagan did more to fudge the Luminous Animal Jun 2015 #34
Great cartoon Gothmog Jun 2015 #6
I am one of those shadows at the end of the line. SmittynMo Jun 2015 #8
Sorry to hear that.. I was almost there too being an IT guy in mid 50's. DCBob Jun 2015 #9
The official unemployment rate almost always SheilaT Jun 2015 #10
Those who aren't looking for work are counted, in the U-4, and it's 0.5% of the population Recursion Jun 2015 #42
K&R Pooka Fey Jun 2015 #11
We need a policy of full employment Agony Jun 2015 #13
There will NEVER be 'full employment'! relrod Jun 2015 #40
Full employment for those able to work. uppityperson Jun 2015 #43
Toon shows,,,, Cryptoad Jun 2015 #16
You did--see post 28! nt MADem Jun 2015 #29
Homeless rate...er um sputter...FREEDOM! AMERICA! WE'RE NUMBER #1!!!! Rex Jun 2015 #22
Of course suggested alternatives are either a) already given or b) fucking stupid whatthehey Jun 2015 #25
K&R WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2015 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Unemployment rate hocus-p...»Reply #20