General Discussion

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)

46. Some have to work much harder than others to get thrown off.

Reply to MineralMan (Reply #19)

Sat Jun 6, 2015, 03:36 PM

Jun 2015

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

71 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2015 OP

They look fine to me. enlightenment Jun 2015 #1

There are clarifications in each forum or group. SOP is under the "about this forum" button above uppityperson Jun 2015 #2

I think they are quite clear DrDan Jun 2015 #3

Need to include the specific words: "cunning stunt". This is an automatically bannable offense. Hiraeth Jun 2015 #4

Except that it isn't, when it is directed at women in general Ms. Toad Jun 2015 #24

IOKIYAHS Hiraeth Jun 2015 #34

Consistency would be helpful in the enforcement of the rules Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2015 #43

Wow. Double standards around here? Who woulda thunk it? Comrade Grumpy Jun 2015 #44

Wow. nt cwydro Jun 2015 #54

Wow! Egnever Jun 2015 #58

This right here is why I have a problem TM99 Jun 2015 #61

I have a problem as well. Ms. Toad Jun 2015 #62

I can't disagree with a word you write. nt TM99 Jun 2015 #63

Just curious how you know more than the Administrators about NYC_SKP's activities on DU... KittyWampus Jun 2015 #64

I'm not assuming anything. I'm taking the admins at their word. Ms. Toad Jun 2015 #66

there are rules and then there is wisdom and justice in enforcing them. unblock Jun 2015 #5

You guys are really working overtime phil89 Jun 2015 #32

i am vastly more interested in process than particular cases. unblock Jun 2015 #71

The DU TOS has always seemed clear to me. MineralMan Jun 2015 #6

One more thing: Don't push your luck. nt Rex Jun 2015 #7

That one's my favorite...LOL. libdem4life Jun 2015 #30

Either or RobertEarl Jun 2015 #8

Apparently the "No Bigoted Hate Speech" section is an assault on freedom, according to many here. DemocraticWing Jun 2015 #9

+1000 beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #15

some of the complaint is about hfojvt Jun 2015 #16

Religion has a lot of gray area Bradical79 Jun 2015 #36

No, but when the response to bigoted hate speech is mostly "it's bad; take care of it yourselves" Ms. Toad Jun 2015 #37

The anti-LGBT speech is a lot of what I'm talking about. DemocraticWing Jun 2015 #40

THOSE FOLKS WHO ARE OFFENDED, can always go start their own place trueblue2007 Jun 2015 #68

This message was hidden by Jury decision. Glassunion Jun 2015 #10

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2015 #12

Got me. Jamastiene Jun 2015 #35

Message auto-removed L0oniX Jun 2015 #60

DU is supposed to be fun KMOD Jun 2015 #11

This part: Exilednight Jun 2015 #13

What's accused ? treestar Jun 2015 #26

I have no problem admitting I'm liberal, in fact I'm proud of it. Exilednight Jun 2015 #28

Of course you're Fringe. Guy is bald with unruly side hair and doesn't color it. LOL libdem4life Jun 2015 #33

yeah, I've been called uber-left rbnyc Jun 2015 #39

Crystal clear, imo... Spazito Jun 2015 #14

Here's the subject on which they would benefit from clarification.... Jim Lane Jun 2015 #17

You take your chances... MineralMan Jun 2015 #19

Right -- and that's precisely the DEFECT of vagueness in rules. Jim Lane Jun 2015 #20

Well, since I'm in favor of people controlling their MineralMan Jun 2015 #21

I sorta disagree, MM wyldwolf Jun 2015 #22

Every forum has its own favorite posters. MineralMan Jun 2015 #23

Some have to work much harder than others to get thrown off. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2015 #46

I can't speak to that. But it's really easy not MineralMan Jun 2015 #47

Look at post #24 in this thread. "Cunning stunts" all over the place, and nobody got hidden. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2015 #50

NYC_SKP had zero jury hides in 90 days Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2015 #59

Who cares how many jury hides he had� how many alerts came in on his posts that didn't get hidden? KittyWampus Jun 2015 #65

I care - and you should too inasmuch as juries are supposed to be the enforcers of DU rules Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2015 #67

WTF? You realize that the Adminstrators DO see more than you and I on this site? That they own it? KittyWampus Jun 2015 #69

You like and admire the admins. I get that. Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2015 #70

That's pretty damn clear already Hekate Jun 2015 #18

if the DU Administrators just don't like you treestar Jun 2015 #25

Two words. 99Forever Jun 2015 #27

The rules are fine, as long as they are applied consistently and fairly tularetom Jun 2015 #29

Why should the site administrators not take a position MineralMan Jun 2015 #49

Obviously the site administrators are free to support any candidate they like, as are we all tularetom Jun 2015 #55

Yeah. Site owner fail. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2015 #52

Why? Are you in charge of re-writing them? LWolf Jun 2015 #31

No- I'm not in charge of rewriting them. I'm asking your opinion of them. Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2015 #41

I don't disagree with that. nt LWolf Jun 2015 #48

In short... rbnyc Jun 2015 #38

That's fair. Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2015 #42

that's a good analogy. rbnyc Jun 2015 #45

You missed one. Be pro Hillary or risk getting banned. L0oniX Jun 2015 #51

As one who makes no secret of being pro-Hillary, I'd say these things: Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2015 #57

They seem clear enough to me. nt cwydro Jun 2015 #53

"DU is supposed to be fun � don't make it suck." <Uh, it's the policticians giving money to bank$ter jtuck004 Jun 2015 #56