Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
59. You can chuckle all you want
Sat May 12, 2012, 11:55 AM
May 2012

Since you are asking for censorship, not me.

I find that actually quite hysterical. You know why?

Damn lib'rul media don't cover us enough...and then damn conservative media does not cover us enough. It's true, it's true, most large media outlets are playing the exact same game, of playing favorites...but some of us try.

You know what is even more hysterical, when I do interviews I make a point not to let the person know what are my political views. Hysterical, isn't it?

So what do you want? And what exactly are you objecting to? Me telling you that we will not play the same game fox and msnbc play? You object to us trying hard to let local voters who is running and do interviews with as many candidates who are making an effort to run? Are you seriously objecting to that? And you are also objecting to any coverage of a still Presidntial candidate? I got a paper fer ya, the San Diego Union Tribune.

Among other things you should know about the Trib, well Congressman Filner has not done a thing in Congress. Nope, this was not in the opinion page, but an actual page one, under the fold, story on the mayoral campaign. Oh and when called on the whopper they closed comments. But that is your paper. And we all thought it could not get worst.

I mean that is the same paper that refused to cover Presidential Candidate Dean as well, never mind there were thousands in attendance too.

But you are asking people do this to those you vehemently disagree. Don't read them. Not making you do it...but don't ask small media fighting against the crap large media is doing, to follow that standard.

If you do, you are part of the problem. That you can object to.

By the way we also covered extensively the State Democratic Convention...I guess that is ok in your book. When the republicans do theirs in town, guess what? We will cover it too. Is that a problem? No serious, asking a very serious question. This us vs them is not healthy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Any sincere historians will remark about the dimensionality of his chess game. NYC_SKP May 2012 #1
I don't think Obama is suggesting that Churches should be required to perform same-sex marriages. pnwmom May 2012 #2
Um, if you wish to address fans of Ron Paul, Gary Johnson and other Libertarians you should try Dragonfli May 2012 #3
I'm afraid I've seen a few here from time to time LeftishBrit May 2012 #7
Sheeeeeit, this place is crawling with PaulBots, as well as zotted Freepers. They may not post, but Erose999 May 2012 #41
They're everywhere! Better check under the bed (they are like .001 percent of the population) Dragonfli May 2012 #44
obsessed with mineral man much? dionysus May 2012 #45
Who? Dragonfli May 2012 #46
uh huh dionysus May 2012 #56
I have a shorter message for them Prophet 451 May 2012 #4
+1000 LeftishBrit May 2012 #6
Highbrow, eh? BCanuck May 2012 #19
Fuck Gary Johnson and any Libertarian douchebags who like him. Ikonoklast May 2012 #22
+1000 maddezmom May 2012 #36
And you're not here anymore to complain. DevonRex May 2012 #30
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #5
Do you actually agree with fans of Ron Paul and Gary Johnson? LeftishBrit May 2012 #8
I think I see what is happening. You repeat the title of the thread whenever you post. LeftishBrit May 2012 #9
It left the building. n/t ProSense May 2012 #11
"suggesting the entire institution would be best left to the church" Prometheus Bound May 2012 #10
Of course the dirty secret no one points out about Paul Blue_Tires May 2012 #12
I mean, how ProSense May 2012 #13
Ron Paul's select groups BCanuck May 2012 #18
seriously? Blue_Tires May 2012 #35
Are you advocating that churches should be forced to perform gay marriages? ProudToBeBlueInRhody May 2012 #14
States and the Feds BCanuck May 2012 #23
Yes they should. It is unconstitutional to deny rights to people Ruby the Liberal May 2012 #25
Oh, you poor dead thing! DevonRex May 2012 #29
Funny you mention that Blue_Tires May 2012 #37
If the federal government recognizes a gay couple as married on their tax return..... ProudToBeBlueInRhody May 2012 #38
Yah, but weed!!...nt SidDithers May 2012 #15
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #16
lol...start a Ron Paul thread and without fail at least one person Blue_Tires May 2012 #17
yup, it's like flypaper maddezmom May 2012 #58
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #20
Who are you supporting for pres at this time? uppityperson May 2012 #21
Fuck Gary Johnson and any Libertarian douchebags who like him. Ikonoklast May 2012 #24
He's gone. FGJ and FRP. uppityperson May 2012 #27
Fuck Ron Paul. Ikonoklast May 2012 #28
Well after covering the Ron Paul Rally nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #26
Paul had the media eating out of his hands in '08 and did nothing with it Blue_Tires May 2012 #33
Are we talking of 2008 when it comes to Paul? nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #39
I get your point Blue_Tires May 2012 #42
Point by point nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #48
What did you ask him in the interview?? Blue_Tires May 2012 #50
Who Hughes? nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #51
he gets the coverage he deserves, he is in it for himself not to win it maddezmom May 2012 #43
No, he is a trouble maker nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #47
you can cover anyone you want but the MSM isn't going to cover him, not because he's a maddezmom May 2012 #49
It is, he's 76 nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #52
it's not playing favorites it's coming to the reality that Paul isn't worth covering maddezmom May 2012 #53
Alas that is not my decision to make nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #54
"And we will continue to cover people you object. That is what RESPONSIBLE media does." zappaman May 2012 #55
and fuck his fans, too maddezmom May 2012 #61
I chuckle at your use of RESPONSIBLE media maddezmom May 2012 #57
You can chuckle all you want nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #59
I'm not asking for censorship maddezmom May 2012 #60
Don't read them nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #62
I said they weren't covering him because he no longer is news maddezmom May 2012 #63
Sorry, but a Presidential candidate nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #64
Nadin, I know you are not a Ron Paul fan. zappaman May 2012 #65
Like I've said over and over maddezmom May 2012 #66
"don't like it, put me on ignore." zappaman May 2012 #67
Feel free to put me on ignore nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #69
looks like we're at an impasse here because I have no intention of putting you on ignore maddezmom May 2012 #70
Foget about missing dogs zappaman May 2012 #71
thanks for the link maddezmom May 2012 #75
You wish I put you there nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #72
no, I suggested you put me there if you didn't want to read my posts maddezmom May 2012 #74
Wow zappaman May 2012 #73
Serious.... maddezmom May 2012 #34
See post 39 nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #40
ProSense, you are the best! It's like flypaper. You trapped quite a few. Tarheel_Dem May 2012 #31
That is the best word to describe it -- BIZARRE Number23 May 2012 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author emulatorloo May 2012 #68
K & R Scurrilous May 2012 #76
Obama is just oozing with love for GBTBLMNOP banana convention. May 2012 #77
It's not ProSense May 2012 #78
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Message to fans of Ron Pa...»Reply #59