General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: frankly, what I think we're doing here, is documenting the last gasps of democracy. Updated [View all]JonLP24
(29,909 posts)Second reply in case of a missed edit but I highly recommend this book for myself as well
Political decay was the word I was I looking for though the book is fairly recent 1989 and guy is a born American. I don't know why I was so off, not just off but way off but anyway this is the book I was thinking of.
Francis Fukuyamas Political Order and Political Decay
<snip>
Perhaps Fukuyamas most interesting section is his discussion of the United States, which is used to illustrate the interaction of democracy and state building. Up through the 19th century, he notes, the United States had a weak, corrupt and patrimonial state. From the end of the 19th to the middle of the 20th century, however, the American state was transformed into a strong and effective independent actor, first by the Progressives and then by the New Deal. This change was driven by a social revolution brought about by industrialization, which mobilized a host of new political actors with no interest in the old clientelist system. The American example shows that democracies can indeed build strong states, but that doing so, Fukuyama argues, requires a lot of effort over a long time by powerful players not tied to the older order.
Yet if the United States illustrates how democratic states can develop, it also illustrates how they can decline. Drawing on Huntington again, Fukuyama reminds us that all political systems past and present are liable to decay, as older institutional structures fail to evolve to meet the needs of a changing world. The fact that a system once was a successful and stable liberal democracy does not mean that it will remain so in perpetuity, and he warns that even the United States has no permanent immunity from institutional decline.
Over the past few decades, American political development has gone into reverse, Fukuyama says, as its state has become weaker, less efficient and more corrupt. One cause is growing economic inequality and concentration of wealth, which has allowed elites to purchase immense political power and manipulate the system to further their own interests. Another cause is the permeability of American political institutions to interest groups, allowing an array of factions that are collectively unrepresentative of the public as a whole to exercise disproportionate influence on government. The result is a vicious cycle in which the American state deals poorly with major challenges, which reinforces the publics distrust of the state, which leads to the states being starved of resources and authority, which leads to even poorer performance.
Where this cycle leads even the vastly knowledgeable Fukuyama cant predict, but suffice to say it is nowhere good. And he fears that Americas problems may increasingly come to characterize other liberal democracies as well, including those of Europe, where the growth of the European Union and the shift of policy making away from national capitals to Brussels has made the European system as a whole . . . resemble that of the United States to an increasing degree.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/14/books/review/francis-fukuyamas-political-order-and-political-decay.html
On edit -- his other work interests me too
Fukuyama remembers. He believes that the Iraq War was being blundered. "All of my friends had taken leave of reality."[25] He has not spoken to Paul Wolfowitz (previously a good friend) since.[25]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Fukuyama