Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This thread may not go well.. but it has to be said... [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)47. No they are not. I invite your attention to those community standards.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards
These broad community standards of behavior are maintained through the combined efforts of members posting and serving on citizen juries, using their own best judgment to decide what behavior is appropriate and what is not.
You are either part of the solution, or you're not. The odds of getting called to jury duty for anyone isn't that huge--even for paying members. Using time zones as an excuse doesn't cut it either...If I'm in Europe or on the west coast I still get called...in fact, if you are a fan of civility, your input would be valued in the wee small hours, as it were.
This is a sandbox that we're ALL expected to police. You can refuse to help, if you'd like, but if you do that you also lose any credibility when you complain about the "tone" or attitude here.
It's also obvious from your remarks that you don't get how the jury system works at all. No one would be "waiting" for your input. If you aren't online, you won't get called to a jury. The pool is people who are logged in...No one waits very long for jury results. As a juror, you have 15 minutes to do your thing, if you dither, you get dropped from the pool and someone else steps in to finish the job.
You can and will do as you please, but you are wrong about how community standards are determined and you don't understand the mechanics of the jury system. You might give it a try before you reject it out of hand.
These broad community standards of behavior are maintained through the combined efforts of members posting and serving on citizen juries, using their own best judgment to decide what behavior is appropriate and what is not.
You are either part of the solution, or you're not. The odds of getting called to jury duty for anyone isn't that huge--even for paying members. Using time zones as an excuse doesn't cut it either...If I'm in Europe or on the west coast I still get called...in fact, if you are a fan of civility, your input would be valued in the wee small hours, as it were.
This is a sandbox that we're ALL expected to police. You can refuse to help, if you'd like, but if you do that you also lose any credibility when you complain about the "tone" or attitude here.
It's also obvious from your remarks that you don't get how the jury system works at all. No one would be "waiting" for your input. If you aren't online, you won't get called to a jury. The pool is people who are logged in...No one waits very long for jury results. As a juror, you have 15 minutes to do your thing, if you dither, you get dropped from the pool and someone else steps in to finish the job.
You can and will do as you please, but you are wrong about how community standards are determined and you don't understand the mechanics of the jury system. You might give it a try before you reject it out of hand.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There is problems with enforcing of rules that gets made worse when we don't alert and join juries..
marble falls
Jun 2015
#32
There have been rumors that some people alert late at night to use smaller jury pools to drive out..
marble falls
Jun 2015
#41
Exactly right. Everybody should also join Mirt for a term. Next one starts up for July1, I think....
marble falls
Jun 2015
#39
IOW, calling Hillary a "dupe" for her Iraq War Vote in 2002 is a no-no, as is calling her a
KingCharlemagne
Jun 2015
#4
I have observed the name calling happens when name calling is the first resort to a reasonable reply
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#10
It's just a cultural thing. If you came to America and did not know the language, you would not
JDPriestly
Jun 2015
#19
As well you should. Its used to be offensive and drive women away from the conversation.
marble falls
Jun 2015
#33
Some words should never be used, it really does not matter how and where they grew up,
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#54
As a male, I find the word VERY OFFENSIVE when used toward women. I have given my
KingCharlemagne
Jun 2015
#83
I have called him a thief of which he admitted he had stolen files, you can not find a vile name
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#60
Wow, even you could testify for the FOJ against Snowden. BTW, I know what data is in the phone call
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#95
Yes, I can see the forest and the trees. Glad you pointed this out, perhaps others will begin to
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#97
Count me in. Pretend you're talking to a beloved relative...debating...discussing...but with
libdem4life
Jun 2015
#12
One of the advantages with having political discussions with this sort of format is
Half-Century Man
Jun 2015
#25
A GREAT idea is to support all our potential candidates, while being critical of issues
Rex
Jun 2015
#44