Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I want to thank the defenders of misogyny [View all]nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)6. Well irony with a nice silver spoon
so here, for ya to enjoy. Will give you this in full
San Diego County to Form a Human Trafficking Taskforce
Oct. 21, 2014 (San Diego) The San Diego County board of supervisors got a report on the multifaceted aspects of human trafficking in San Diego. According to the District Attorneys office, San Diego is the 13th highest child prostitution areas in the country. They are quoting Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) data.
This effort started with the formation of an advisory council that reported today on their finding. Members of this council came from multiple areas of law enforcement, the private sector and academia. Jenee Littrell, an expert in the subject, and an educator, led them. This initial advisory board was established June 14, 2011.
According to one of the members of the team, this has been a labor of love with all the subcommittees coming together. In the initial testimony to the board human trafficking was spoken as this incredible human rights violation of women, children and men being prevented from pursuing the dream that the constitution gave us.
During the hearing the other side of the trade, and that is international human trafficking, which was highlighted during the summer, was never addressed. Regardless, the advisory commission came with a series of recommendations to the board, and how to implement them.
It is clear that due to the relationships formed, different agencies are working more efficiently and better than we were before
The education subcommittee would like to continue with education awareness with school personnel across San Diego County. This is critical, they want to be able to share information legally between agencies across the county to avoid anybody from falling through the cracks.
As far as law enforcement and the Office of the District Attorney, they match. They both want the formation of a county wide taskforce and increased education. IN addition we also have victim identification as a big goal. The reason, is that victims do not self-identify as victims. This will include identifying and helping child victims, which is a special challenge.
Some of these recommendations include training in trauma, and high levels of coordination between all areas of government, ranging from law enforcement to health and human services. Most importantly, and some of this already recognized, not treating the victims of trafficking, especially those in the sex trade, as prostitutes, but as victims of rape.
Before the vote, Supervisor Greg Cox did muse that the Gang Taskforce started in a similar way, and that the recommendations would require money. So now, one of the challenges is getting the funds to implement the recommendations.
Board members were very impressed. Chairwoman Dianne Jacob would like to make San Diego go down in the list of regions where this problem is well-known. Though she wants to implement the recommendations. The board voted unanimously.
Oct. 21, 2014 (San Diego) The San Diego County board of supervisors got a report on the multifaceted aspects of human trafficking in San Diego. According to the District Attorneys office, San Diego is the 13th highest child prostitution areas in the country. They are quoting Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) data.
This effort started with the formation of an advisory council that reported today on their finding. Members of this council came from multiple areas of law enforcement, the private sector and academia. Jenee Littrell, an expert in the subject, and an educator, led them. This initial advisory board was established June 14, 2011.
According to one of the members of the team, this has been a labor of love with all the subcommittees coming together. In the initial testimony to the board human trafficking was spoken as this incredible human rights violation of women, children and men being prevented from pursuing the dream that the constitution gave us.
During the hearing the other side of the trade, and that is international human trafficking, which was highlighted during the summer, was never addressed. Regardless, the advisory commission came with a series of recommendations to the board, and how to implement them.
It is clear that due to the relationships formed, different agencies are working more efficiently and better than we were before
The education subcommittee would like to continue with education awareness with school personnel across San Diego County. This is critical, they want to be able to share information legally between agencies across the county to avoid anybody from falling through the cracks.
As far as law enforcement and the Office of the District Attorney, they match. They both want the formation of a county wide taskforce and increased education. IN addition we also have victim identification as a big goal. The reason, is that victims do not self-identify as victims. This will include identifying and helping child victims, which is a special challenge.
Some of these recommendations include training in trauma, and high levels of coordination between all areas of government, ranging from law enforcement to health and human services. Most importantly, and some of this already recognized, not treating the victims of trafficking, especially those in the sex trade, as prostitutes, but as victims of rape.
Before the vote, Supervisor Greg Cox did muse that the Gang Taskforce started in a similar way, and that the recommendations would require money. So now, one of the challenges is getting the funds to implement the recommendations.
Board members were very impressed. Chairwoman Dianne Jacob would like to make San Diego go down in the list of regions where this problem is well-known. Though she wants to implement the recommendations. The board voted unanimously.
You know what is even more ironic. In the white and black world you mostly live, this will shock you. The board is a 4:1 republican, but all voted for it.
This is what I find so ironic. Many of us have been saying that the conversations you seem NOW to want to have, are not had on this site.
Enjoy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
353 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Somehow this seems to be a non sequitur to the OP, and a rather bizarre contribution.
Hekate
Jun 2015
#53
And that has in fact been my own experiences with discussions of modern-day slavery
BainsBane
Jun 2015
#287
Liberalism is a political ideology that accepts the legitimacy of capitalism
BainsBane
Jun 2015
#289
That was indeed an impressive survey of the state of Liberalism/Capitalism, but
Bonobo
Jun 2015
#325
Your obviously formidable grasp of political history and persuasive power
closeupready
Jun 2015
#334
Please tell me what other oppressed groups would you apply that formulation to?
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2015
#138
Apparently if were not angry enough or do not protest the language used here enough,
notadmblnd
Jun 2015
#110
DU has many tools to avoid reading things that get you tired. Ignore, hide thread, block keywords
seaglass
Jun 2015
#114
You probably don't get angry about anything, right? Just exhausted and tired. I get angry about
seaglass
Jun 2015
#117
A fascinating and sad point. "No woman banned NYCSKP but women are blamed..."
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#328
That point about his followers rejecting his calls to lead a positive campaign
BainsBane
Jun 2015
#348
"Death penalty"? And, yeah if he "regrets" it then he should own it and apologize..not try the lame
Cha
Jun 2015
#23
The others did.. how did they do it? Or he can always get one of his many friends to lobby for him
Cha
Jun 2015
#37
Hyperbole like anyone who said banning was too severe is personally attacking the OP?
jeff47
Jun 2015
#45
The problem is that after Hebdo murders, SKP was very clear that he felt provocative or insulting
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2015
#118
It is indeed convenient to predicate on'e own hysterical melodrama on its perceived use by another.
LanternWaste
Jun 2015
#150
You can tell someone really wants to bring up the discussion level of the board
jeff47
Jun 2015
#152
Ug, and that faux-academic writing... it's as badly written as it is meaningless.
Bonobo
Jun 2015
#276
Hiding behind a reducto absurdum can often be much more important than rational thought...
LanternWaste
Jun 2015
#145
I've run into it since the sixties. Pretty rough stuff, too. Still didn't expect it here.
freshwest
Jun 2015
#31
So what? Anyone is free to support whom they want.. on this board too. Even the Admins! Wow
Cha
Jun 2015
#25
That is very interesting because I felt it was pretty clear she was one sided with her posts
cui bono
Jun 2015
#245
Yes, the discrimination against teachers has always been a sore point with me.
freshwest
Jun 2015
#38
Can you supply links to "many" instances on DU claiming the following have no consequence:
MannyGoldstein
Jun 2015
#29
Repeating this opinion is disingenuous and keeps us from talking about real issues...
MrMickeysMom
Jun 2015
#36
Wow, so you don't consider the attack the Republican party has brought forth against women's rights
justiceischeap
Jun 2015
#225
If I see anyone taking a hard line at ALL times, I will promptly direct them to your post. n/t
prayin4rain
Jun 2015
#72
So? That was stupid but it wasn't directed at Hillary Clinton who SKP has shown nothing but
Cha
Jun 2015
#83
It's misogynistic directed towards any woman. Just because that wasn't alerted on doesn't make
Cha
Jun 2015
#89
Of course they care about misogyny .. who wouldn't? Except rw who try to keep women down..
Cha
Jun 2015
#94
Yes, it was how SKP "elaborated" on it, thank you! Unfortunately after the decision was made..
Cha
Jun 2015
#97
But you have to defend every use of the word now, according to some, that...
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#330
But it was OK for millions of African Americans to support Obama in 2008 because he was black
question everything
Jun 2015
#77
This is not what one does if one wants to support their candidate in the mainstream
herding cats
Jun 2015
#63
You very publicly made your choice months ago, so what the hell are you talking about?
Marr
Jun 2015
#180
Powerful and passionate words, I admire Hillary as I do Bernie, both have strengths and what I see as
AuntPatsy
Jun 2015
#75
I'm looking forward to the October announcement! I wish there was a subscription service available..
Violet_Crumble
Jun 2015
#115
It December I predict it will be Santa Claus that forced her to do it n/m
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Jun 2015
#124
I'll just say that in terms of people posting on the internet 'for' some candidate, I try not to
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2015
#121
So you are voting for Hillary just because she is a woman, but are fighting entitled privilege-
snooper2
Jun 2015
#125
True enough but, who do you see to round out Bernie's ticket? I would be happy to see
Hiraeth
Jun 2015
#137
The marriage was a springboard to MILLION$$$ and, possibly, the Presidency. nt
Romulox
Jun 2015
#154
I do understand that part. I guess my soul is worth more to me than the Presidency/money.
Hiraeth
Jun 2015
#157
She is not voting for Clinton. She is voting against Bernie. I support her right.
Hiraeth
Jun 2015
#239
I am old enough to read this whole thread and realize that that the OP endorses Clinton
Hiraeth
Jun 2015
#240
Good point. Women who are not being systematically raped should be grateful enough to keep their
prayin4rain
Jun 2015
#143
Hillary Clinton is easily the MOST privileged person in the race. That's hard to explain away. nt
Romulox
Jun 2015
#153
Nonsense. Hillary Clinton jets around the world as one of the 1%. You can't downplay privilege.
Romulox
Jun 2015
#160
Money is the ULTIMATE privilege. The only person "downplaying" anything is YOU. nt
Romulox
Jun 2015
#163
Right. A private jet ride doesn't prevent one's soiree from being rained out. So private jet rides
Romulox
Jun 2015
#190
You think wealthy black men get killed by cops at the same rate as poor black men?
Comrade Grumpy
Jun 2015
#212
Actual things posted on DU about women who stick up for feminist principles.
Starry Messenger
Jun 2015
#155
It must suck to support a candidate that can't win on the issues and having to stoop to the lowest
Exilednight
Jun 2015
#215
Yes, you are trying to shame people. Your OP is filled with accusations and zero evidence.
Exilednight
Jun 2015
#219
I know. It's much easier to accuse and run. Then they sit around wondering why no one takes them
Exilednight
Jun 2015
#223
Your OP is about accusations without evidence and scapegoating Bernie supporters.
Exilednight
Jun 2015
#274
How many times have you made this declaration? 3rd...4th? Anymore, this comes to mind.
Katashi_itto
Jun 2015
#234
"Swatting at gnats while the tigers are eating your ass is a lack of priorities."
GoneOffShore
Jun 2015
#304
Okay, this is making me feel weird. I'm well aware of things but disingenuous. How do you know me?
betsuni
Jun 2015
#329
Bold faced lie. DU was/is universal in condemning the Hobby Lobby decision
riderinthestorm
Jun 2015
#305
Link it. Seriously. Plus please go back and provide evidence of the other statements up thread
riderinthestorm
Jun 2015
#309
Seriously? One person expresses general support for our justice system, IN GENERAL
riderinthestorm
Jun 2015
#336
I have learned how to control my feelings when it comes to name calling.
SaranchaIsWaiting
Jun 2015
#323