Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Hillary Offers a Path Forward Beyond the Gridlock [View all]
Last edited Mon Jun 8, 2015, 11:26 PM - Edit history (1)
http://correctrecord.org/At her Silicon Valley speech last week, Hillary spoke about the importance of bipartisanship, saying that we cant make progress on the biggest issues facing our country if we dont work across the aisle and listen to each other. Hillary said, Id like to bring people from the right, left, red, blue, get them into a nice, warm purple space where everybody is talking and where were actually trying to solve problems.
In the meantime, a slew of potential Republican presidential contenders spent the week at the Conservative Political Action Committee conference in Washington, where they engaged in hyper-partisan rhetoric and distracted from the real issues at hand.
Hillarys message was a positive one aimed at bringing both sides together. She said, I dont think I have all the right ideas. I dont think my party has all the right ideas. And she even praised Republican Congressman Paul Ryan for working with Democrat Senator Patty Murray on a budget deal in 2013 to avoid a government shutdown.
Ted Cruzs message at the conference was fiercely combative, telling the audience they should stand up against President Obama and those Republicans who disagree with him ideologically. Carly Fiorinas speech was even worse full of one attack after another against President Obama, Secretary Clinton, and Senator Warren.
Instead of using this opportunity on the national stage to talk about real issues and deliver a positive message for the American people, these politicians decided to stick with negativity.
No wonder Americans are so fed up with Washington. This kind of hyper-partisanship embodies everything that is wrong with our political system. Americans want Washington and Congress to work again, for all of us, which is exactly what Hillary Clinton wants, and what she did in the Senate. Notable Republicans from Lindsey Graham to John McCain have praised Hillary Clintons ability to put politics aside for the sake of progress while she was in the Senate.
When asked if she could wave a magic wand and have her wish granted, Clinton said, that we could get back to working together cooperatively again, that we could get out of our mindsets, our partisan bunkers. You cant run a great country like that, and this is the greatest country, and we need to start acting like it and working like it again.
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The corollary is then also true, and any progressive legislation is denied too, yes?
LanternWaste
Jun 2015
#124
They are both members in the Senate, they could lead the way to bipartisanship.
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#71
Gridlock keeps the GOP from dashing the country to pieces and reversing 80 years of progress.
leveymg
Jun 2015
#101
Absolutely. The American people are tired of the same rhetoric that the billionaire's
rhett o rick
Jun 2015
#129
Then I wonder why Congressional members are not using the bully pulpit. They are supposed
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#138
That seems a bit harsh, but I do see why some here feel that way (her own doing, btw).
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2015
#74
It isn't just that she's ideologically too right-wing. She's also a highly vulnerable candidate
leveymg
Jun 2015
#104
I hear ya. Time to bust Rethug heads, take back the Senate and House, and screw bi-partisonship.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2015
#72
Exactly. Which means making trades often at the expense of the vulnerable. No thanks. To
jwirr
Jun 2015
#112
Forward to corporate domination and rule of the wealthy. The path surrender.
TheKentuckian
Jun 2015
#6
"Republicans from Lindsey Graham to John McCain have praised Hillary Clinton’s ability"
Fumesucker
Jun 2015
#8
Yes, since "reaching across the aisle" and "bipartisanship" have worked SO FUCKING WELL
hatrack
Jun 2015
#10
I haven't seen a lot of working across the aisle especially from 2010 to the present, if I missed
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#12
This is why I questioned the time line from 2009 to present. it is gridlock,
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#16
Go back to the post in the thread, I know what bipartisanship is, I know republicans refuse to give,
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#25
And if she should be successful i doubt she would want to take credit but enjoy
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#40
This would be very good, we would need a 60 members in the Senate and 218 in the
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#137
How about the Democratic party fight for what they believe so people will vote for them.
Dawgs
Jun 2015
#103
Just explain how this is going to work when the Democrats are not in the majority.
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#108
I'm with you there River. Better to be who she really is than a complete phony.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2015
#79
It isn't going to last long. It makes me ill that she'll be making her first major speech at FDR
RiverLover
Jun 2015
#87
Bipartisanship may be a dirty word, Congress should be about working on problems and resolving issue
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#20
Optics. It has to look like spontaneous posts from a bunch of "regular" people. (nt)
jeff47
Jun 2015
#22
She is striking the right tone. Even if a Democrat ends up having to go it alone
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#27
No, the TeaPubliKlan radical regressive are all but utterly wrong, willfully destructive to
TheKentuckian
Jun 2015
#58
Yes, it's the right thing to say. I wouldn't want to elect someone who says otherwise. Nt
stevenleser
Jun 2015
#84
Of course you wouldn't. I suggest your mindset is even more a share of the problem than the
TheKentuckian
Jun 2015
#93
I can't even believe that she is campaigning on giving the republicans even more.
Doctor_J
Jun 2015
#36
This Approach Did Not Work For Obama - Why Will It Work For HRC - More Empty Rhetoric
cantbeserious
Jun 2015
#54
And what is strategy, her plan, for bringing my neighbors and I into that warm purple space.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2015
#61
Co-sponsoring bills as Senators is a lot different than getting cooperation as President.
Dawgs
Jun 2015
#106
Yes, worrying about 'divisiveness' is the 'correct' DC Village thing to do
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2015
#123
Sure she has, she has learned that you can fool some of the people all of the time
Fumesucker
Jun 2015
#122
I thought that the talking point is Hillary will *fight* the Republicans better than anyone else?
Fumesucker
Jun 2015
#125
I am surprised to see so many here who wants to continue with the GOP gridlock, I would have
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#127
What would you like the people to give up to please the Republicans?
SaranchaIsWaiting
Jun 2015
#140
Where did the conclusion risk of Social Security, women's rights etc come?
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#143
The Repuglicans will not give in. That has been well established over this President's term.
SaranchaIsWaiting
Jun 2015
#146
This is why talking to each other and co-sponsoring bills together and it still does happen
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#147
Obama said same thing after his election. Why would we believe it would turn out differently?
peacebird
Jun 2015
#128