Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(106,005 posts)
7. That law - what the fuck were they thinking?
Tue Jun 9, 2015, 05:43 PM
Jun 2015
But the approach the legislators chose for addressing this problem — requiring women to list every sexual encounter that could have produced their child in newspaper ads, so as to track down biological fathers in advance of the child being given up for adoption — was a disgraceful and humiliating violation of privacy. Here's how the New York Times described it in 2003:

The Scarlet Letter law required women to run advertisements disclosing their names, ages, height, hair and eye color, race and weight as well as the child's name and birthplace and a description of the possible father.

It also required the women to provide details of the dates and places of sexual encounters that might have produced the child. Women were required to run the advertisements once a week for a month in the community where the child may have been conceived.

The adoption law passed with overwhelming bipartisan majorities, and its major champion was a Democrat, state Sen. Walter "Skip" Campbell. But there's some question about whether many legislators were even aware the Scarlet Letter provision existed."I have to admit I'm horrified that I voted for this," Democratic state Rep. Lois Frankel told the Gainesville Sun a year later.

http://www.vox.com/2015/6/9/8751955/jeb-bush-scarlet-letter-mothers

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'd much rather get rid of slut shaming idiots Warpy Jun 2015 #1
+1 daleanime Jun 2015 #12
He can start with Bristol Palin KamaAina Jun 2015 #2
You win the thread. AwakeAtLast Jun 2015 #21
Fox spin--"1995? He was a child, barely out his teens." nt valerief Jun 2015 #3
Wouldnt he have been 42 in 1995? bunnies Jun 2015 #4
What a piece oh shit shenmue Jun 2015 #5
Jeb needs to wear a scarlet A... 3catwoman3 Jun 2015 #6
Tattoo it on his forehead. hifiguy Jun 2015 #15
That law - what the fuck were they thinking? muriel_volestrangler Jun 2015 #7
The Scarlet Letter is this thing called fiction. .. Initech Jun 2015 #8
That "public shaming" include his own brats? Archae Jun 2015 #9
Once again, notice this is absolutely and totally directed against women. SheilaT Jun 2015 #10
Actually, if a man wrote that article and used the words with regard to women that are JDPriestly Jun 2015 #16
You are much more "delicate" about this subject erronis Jun 2015 #18
Remember that this is Bar's favorite spawn. roamer65 Jun 2015 #11
Right...he's the one she called "brilliant." ROFL. nt City Lights Jun 2015 #19
There needs to be a stigma attached to psychopaths breeding more useless psychopaths Dont call me Shirley Jun 2015 #13
phantom power Diclotican Jun 2015 #14
How about wedded whores? Or, politicians who do Pay for Play for a living? Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2015 #17
Let's publicly shame the Bush family Jack Rabbit Jun 2015 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jeb Bush: Let’s Get Rid O...»Reply #7