Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hey suckers, we put the full text of the #TPP online for you to read. [View all]G_j
(40,569 posts)29. Republicans were 52 to 0 in favor, with 2 abstentions; and Democrats were 13 to 31 against
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-tpp-and-the-ttip-how-congressional-republicans-lie-to-approve-obamas-trade-deals/5450662
Whereas Democrats in Congress tend to be opposed to Fast Track, Republicans in Congress have always supported it with near-unanimity. However, some Republicans face such strong resistance from their voters back home, that they lie and say they oppose Fast Track. When that congressperson subsequently votes in the Senate or House to pass Fast Track, only few of their voters back home even notice. And this increases even more the congresspersons contempt for his or her voters, that theyre just fools or suckers. And this, in turn, reinforces that congresspersons belief that only his or her rich benefactors should even be of concern at all.
Here are some headlines that feature Republicans speaking out against Obamas trade deals:
Sen. Jeff Sessions Blasts Obamatrade
Eagle Forum: No Fast Track for Obamatrade
TheTeaParty.net: No Fast Track for Obamatrade
American Family Association: No Fast Track for Obamatrade
Obamatrade: A gift for Sharia regimes
Conservatives hate Obamatrade even more than Democrats do
Then, theres this:
Chris Christie comes out against fast track, joins 6 other GOP presidential aspirants
That last one is dated 18 May 2015, and it says:
Whereas Democrats in Congress tend to be opposed to Fast Track, Republicans in Congress have always supported it with near-unanimity. However, some Republicans face such strong resistance from their voters back home, that they lie and say they oppose Fast Track. When that congressperson subsequently votes in the Senate or House to pass Fast Track, only few of their voters back home even notice. And this increases even more the congresspersons contempt for his or her voters, that theyre just fools or suckers. And this, in turn, reinforces that congresspersons belief that only his or her rich benefactors should even be of concern at all.
Here are some headlines that feature Republicans speaking out against Obamas trade deals:
Sen. Jeff Sessions Blasts Obamatrade
Eagle Forum: No Fast Track for Obamatrade
TheTeaParty.net: No Fast Track for Obamatrade
American Family Association: No Fast Track for Obamatrade
Obamatrade: A gift for Sharia regimes
Conservatives hate Obamatrade even more than Democrats do
Then, theres this:
Chris Christie comes out against fast track, joins 6 other GOP presidential aspirants
That last one is dated 18 May 2015, and it says:
With Chris Christie now coming out against fast track, joining presidential aspirants Bobby Jindal, Carly Fiorina, Rand Paul, Donald Trump, Lindsey Graham and Mike Huckabee, it is clear that Republican voters are dead set opposed to granting trade authority to President Obama. Meanwhile, Senate Republicans are risking seats in 2016 in Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin to get the legislation passed, jeopardizing any majority in the Senate a new Republican president might enjoy, and making it harder to win the states he or she will need in order to even get to the White House.
But this was already four days after the key vote in the Senate, in which 52 Republicans voted Yea, 2 Republicans failed to vote at all, and no Republican voted Nay on Fast Track in other words, they actually voted to pass into law all of Obamas international-trade deals. This included Rand Paul, and Lindsay Graham, who are the only two U.S. Senators on that lying list of alleged opponents of Fast Track. Voting along with them for Fast Track were 13 Democrats. But of the 33 Nay votes (the votes against Fast Track), 31 were Democrats, and 2 were Independents. None were Republicans.
So: Republicans were 52 to 0 in favor, with 2 abstentions; and Democrats were 13 to 31 against. Obama had virtually 100% of the Republicans with him, and he had 70% of the Democrats against him. This is normal for cheating the public. Whereas all Republicans are usually bad, only around 30% of Democrats are. Its easier being a Republican in Congress you just do what the people who invested in you invested in you to do. For Democrats, its not that easy.
But this was already four days after the key vote in the Senate, in which 52 Republicans voted Yea, 2 Republicans failed to vote at all, and no Republican voted Nay on Fast Track in other words, they actually voted to pass into law all of Obamas international-trade deals. This included Rand Paul, and Lindsay Graham, who are the only two U.S. Senators on that lying list of alleged opponents of Fast Track. Voting along with them for Fast Track were 13 Democrats. But of the 33 Nay votes (the votes against Fast Track), 31 were Democrats, and 2 were Independents. None were Republicans.
So: Republicans were 52 to 0 in favor, with 2 abstentions; and Democrats were 13 to 31 against. Obama had virtually 100% of the Republicans with him, and he had 70% of the Democrats against him. This is normal for cheating the public. Whereas all Republicans are usually bad, only around 30% of Democrats are. Its easier being a Republican in Congress you just do what the people who invested in you invested in you to do. For Democrats, its not that easy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Fox, Drudge or WND could not have done better in the ongoing anti-Obama TPP propaganda, or the lame name-calling.
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#13
"Embarrassing" takes a back seat to getting some Recs. based on name calling.
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#25
Challenging Obama on his support for the TPP is not bashing but being a good Democrat.
rhett o rick
Jun 2015
#68
So we should just let a president do whatever s/he wants as long as they have a D?
cui bono
Jun 2015
#99
Ummm, they are promoting this monstrosity as are all the republican establishment in washington.
Dragonfli
Jun 2015
#17
Of course we are pro-labor; kindly look at the pro-labor Obama E.O.'s lately, and the newly muscular NLRB.
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#21
Yes indeed a very large portion of people have now given up trying to find work, I guess that is
Dragonfli
Jun 2015
#95
This thing will pass (if at all) on the strength of REPUBLICAN votes. Truth hurts, eh? nt
Romulox
Jun 2015
#18
I detest Fox as much as the next guy, but you exaggerate the meaning of Fox's position.
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#23
JC. Supporting free trade is not the same as supporting the TPA/TPP. Quit making shit up. n/t
Dawgs
Jun 2015
#32
Republicans were 52 to 0 in favor, with 2 abstentions; and Democrats were 13 to 31 against
G_j
Jun 2015
#29
Do you trust Obama's judgement? Because I sure as hell don't. Nor do I trust the judgement of
Erose999
Jun 2015
#33
Yes, I do trust Obama's judgment...on this also because his judgment has been generally most excellent.
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#36
The good old dull and boring "blind follower" blind generality accusation. I trust Obama because he earned my trust. Period.
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#102
Funny how they imply anti-TPP is a republican-like position, isn't it? It's opposite day!
arcane1
Jun 2015
#45
That brings up another point, although irrelevant as to whether or not we should trust Obama
Jack Rabbit
Jun 2015
#54
I'm part of a union SMART-TD formerly UTU. Last year, our union heads negotiated in SECRET
neverforget
Jun 2015
#80
Our contract was not up for renegotiation when they did this. They did this without telling the
neverforget
Jun 2015
#90
Driving the point home, perfectly. The defenders of the 1% will have a fit!
countryjake
Jun 2015
#97
Resistance to TPP could be a springboard to progressive success in the elections 2016.
marble falls
Jun 2015
#103
that is funny. scary true, but funny. I realized that, whenever I see tpp, I read "toilet paper"
niyad
Jun 2015
#108